Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Comparison between intra-venous versus intra-arterial heparin during transradial coronary artery catheterization
Mohammed Almansori1, Shady Ouf1
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Dammam.
Background:
Trans-radial coronary artery catheterization is gaining popularity, heparin has been proven to reduce the rate of radial artery occlusion, intra-venous or intra-arterial heparin have no effect on the radial artery occlusion, we investigate the effect of route of heparin administration on different procedure related parameters.
Methods:
We randomized 150 consecutive patients to receive intra-venous (75 patients) or intra-arterial (75 patients) heparin; the two groups were compared regarding different procedure related parameters.
Results:
The success rate was over 99% and rate of radial artery spasm was about 5%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the parameters tested.
Conclusion:
The trans-radial angiography can be performed successfully in the Saudi population, Studies with larger sample size are needed to show a significant difference between intra-arterial and intra-venous heparin administration.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

