Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Platform switching versus conventional technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Dental implants with platform switching showed significantly less bone loss compared to nonplatform-switched controls. This finding supports platform switching as a beneficial design for preserving bone around dental implants.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Periodontology
Background:
- Crestal bone loss is a common complication following dental implant placement.
- Implant design features, such as platform switching, may influence bone preservation.
- Understanding the impact of implant design on bone levels is crucial for long-term success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of platform-switched dental implants versus nonplatform-switched implants on crestal bone loss.
- To evaluate the radiographic outcomes of platform switching in a prospective, controlled study.
- To assess bone level changes at different time points after implant placement.
Main Methods:
- A controlled prospective study involving 53 patients at four study centers.
- Random assignment of patients to receive either platform-switched (test) or nonplatform-switched (control) implants.
- Radiographic analysis of crestal bone levels at implant placement, restoration delivery, and 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- Significantly less crestal bone loss was observed around platform-switched implants (0.25 mm) compared to control implants (0.65 mm).
- Bone loss around control implants showed a declining trend by the 1-year follow-up.
- The study included treatment for single and multiple edentulous sites across all quadrants.
Conclusions:
- Platform-switched dental implants demonstrate superior crestal bone preservation compared to nonplatform-switched implants.
- The built-in design of platform switching appears to mitigate bone loss around dental implants.
- These findings suggest platform switching is a valuable consideration for enhancing the longevity of dental restorations.
More Related Videos
08:22Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: An Update on Safety and Tolerability
Published on: October 7, 2017
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Blinding
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...