Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): a comparison with a repair using double-J stent

Radim Kočvara1, Josef Sedláček1, Marcel Drlík1

  • 1Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital in Praha and Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic.

Insights

Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty is feasible in select young children, avoiding secondary anesthesia and stent complications. This approach offers comparable outcomes to stented laparoscopic and open surgeries for high-grade hydronephrosis.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Pediatric Nephrology

Background:

  • High-grade hydronephrosis in young children often requires pyeloplasty.
  • Traditional pyeloplasty may involve stents, increasing risks of complications and repeat anesthesia.
  • Laparoscopic pyeloplasty offers a minimally invasive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children aged 1-5 years.
  • To compare outcomes of unstented vs. stented laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy compared to open surgery.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 70 children (1-5 years) with high-grade hydronephrosis undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
  • Group L1: 34 unstented repairs; Group L2: 21 double-J stent repairs; Group L3: 15 uretero-pyelostomy stent repairs.
  • Outcomes compared with 52 age-matched children who had open surgery.

Main Results:

  • Operation times were shorter in unstented and double-J stented laparoscopic groups compared to uretero-pyelostomy stented group and open repairs.
  • Complication rates were similar across all laparoscopic groups and between laparoscopic and open surgery groups.
  • Specific complications included urine leakage/obstruction (unstented), obstruction/pyelonephritis (double-J), and stent displacement (uretero-pyelostomy).

Conclusions:

  • Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe and effective option for selected young children with favorable anatomy.
  • This technique avoids the need for secondary anesthesia and stent-related issues.
  • It demonstrates comparable outcomes to stented laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty procedures.
Abstract