Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Isolation and Differentiation of Primary Myoblasts from Mouse Skeletal Muscle Explants
Published on: October 15, 2019
Molecular brakes regulating mTORC1 activation in skeletal muscle following synergist ablation
D Lee Hamilton1, Andrew Philp2, Matthew G MacKenzie3
1Health and Exercise Sciences Research Group, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom; Division of Molecular Physiology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; d.l.hamilton@stir.ac.uk.
Abstract:
The goal of the current work was to profile positive (mTORC1 activation, autocrine/paracrine growth factors) and negative [AMPK, unfolded protein response (UPR)] pathways that might regulate overload-induced mTORC1 (mTOR complex 1) activation with the hypothesis that a number of negative regulators of mTORC1 will be engaged during a supraphysiological model of hypertrophy. To achieve this, mTORC1-IRS-1/2 signaling, BiP/CHOP/IRE1α, and AMPK activation were determined in rat plantaris muscle following synergist ablation (SA). SA resulted in significant increases in muscle mass of ~4% per day throughout the 21 days of the experiment. The expression of the insulin-like growth factors (IGF) were high throughout the 21st day of overload. However, IGF signaling was limited, since IRS-1 and -2 were undetectable in the overloaded muscle from day 3 to day 9. The decreases in IRS-1/2 protein were paralleled by increases in GRB10 Ser(501/503) and S6K1 Thr(389) phosphorylation, two mTORC1 targets that can destabilize IRS proteins. PKB Ser(473) phosphorylation was higher from 3-6 days, and this was associated with increased TSC2 Thr(939) phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of TSC2 (Thr1345) (an AMPK site) was also elevated, whereas phosphorylation at the other PKB site, Thr(1462), was unchanged at 6 days. In agreement with the phosphorylation of Thr(1345), SA led to activation of AMPKα1 during the initial growth phase, lasting the first 9 days before returning to baseline by day 12. The UPR markers CHOP and BiP were elevated over the first 12 days following ablation, whereas IRE1α levels decreased. These data suggest that during supraphysiological muscle loading at least three potential molecular brakes engage to downregulate mTORC1.
Insights
Supraphysiological muscle overload activates mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) but also engages negative regulators like AMPK and UPR pathways to downregulate growth.
Area of Science:
- Muscle physiology and molecular signaling.
- Cellular response to mechanical stress.
- Regulation of protein synthesis and cell growth.
Background:
- Muscle hypertrophy is regulated by complex signaling pathways.
- mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) is a key regulator of muscle growth.
- Understanding negative feedback mechanisms is crucial for studying hypertrophy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate positive and negative signaling pathways involved in overload-induced mTORC1 activation.
- To test the hypothesis that negative regulators of mTORC1 are engaged during supraphysiological muscle hypertrophy.
- To profile mTORC1, AMPK, and unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways in a rat model.
Main Methods:
- Synergist ablation (SA) model in rat plantaris muscle.
- Measurement of mTORC1-IRS-1/2 signaling.
- Assessment of AMPK activation and UPR markers (BiP, CHOP, IRE1α).
Main Results:
- SA induced rapid muscle mass increase (~4%/day).
- Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling was limited due to low IRS-1/2.
- AMPK activation and UPR markers (CHOP, BiP) were elevated during initial growth, suggesting negative regulation of mTORC1.
Conclusions:
- Supraphysiological muscle loading engages multiple negative regulatory pathways.
- AMPK and UPR act as molecular brakes to downregulate mTORC1 during hypertrophy.
- These findings provide insights into the complex control of muscle growth.
Related Concept Videos
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Satellite Stem Cells and Muscular Dystrophy
Cross-bridge Cycle

