Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Is the UK NICE "reference case" influencing the practice of pediatric quality-adjusted life-year measurement within
Nick Adlard1, Philip Kinghorn1, Emma Frew1
1Health Economics Unit, School of Health & Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Insights
Pediatric cost-utility analyses in the UK often deviate from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Studies frequently use adult measures for health outcomes instead of child-specific instruments, impacting quality-adjusted life-year assessments.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Pediatric Health Services Research
Background:
- The practice of conducting cost-utility analyses (CUAs) in pediatric populations within the UK has evolved over time.
- Assessing and valuing health-related outcomes in these analyses is a critical component.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the evolution of UK pediatric CUAs, focusing on outcome assessment and valuation.
- To compare current methods with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) reference case guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of studies published between May 2004 and April 2012 (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane) and May 2004 to December 2010 (Paediatric Economic Database Evaluation).
- Screening of identified studies by three independent reviewers.
Main Results:
- Forty-three studies were identified; 11 used primary research for utility values.
- Significant discrepancies exist between methods used for outcome measurement/valuation and NICE recommendations.
- Most studies employed adult measures for health outcomes, contrary to NICE guidance for child-specific instruments.
Conclusions:
- Future pediatric CUAs should clearly define age ranges and perspectives for costs and effects.
- Increased research funding is recommended for primary studies measuring utilities specifically in children.
- Addressing variability in quality-adjusted life-year measurement is crucial for aligning with NICE guidelines.
Objectives:
To report findings from a systematic review, this article sought to address two related questions. First, how has the practice of UK pediatric cost-utility analyses evolved over time, in particular how are health-related outcomes assessed and valued? Second, how do the methods compare to the limited guidance available, in particular, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) reference case(s)?
Methods:
Electronic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were conducted for the period May 2004 to April 2012 and the Paediatric Economic Database Evaluation database for the period May 2004 to December 2010. Identified studies were screened by three independent reviewers.
Results:
Forty-three studies were identified, 11 of which elicit utility values through primary research. A discrepancy was identified between the methods used for outcome measurement and valuation and the methods advocated within the NICE reference case. Despite NICE recommending the use of preference-based instruments designed specifically for children, most studies that were identified had used adult measures. In fact, the measurement of quality-adjusted life-years is the aspect of economic evaluation with the greatest amount of variability and the area that most digressed from the NICE reference case.
Conclusions:
Recommendations stemming from the review are that all studies should specify the age range of childhood and include separate statements of perspective for costs and effects as well as the reallocation of research funding away from systematic review studies toward good quality primary research measuring utilities in children.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Relative Risk
Regression Toward the Mean
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
