Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Two-dimensional (2D) microscopy encompasses a range of optical techniques that capture images within a single focal plane, offering detailed representations of microscopic structures. These techniques are essential in biological and medical research, enabling the visualization of cellular and subcellular structures with different levels of contrast and specificity.There are several major types of 2D microscopy, each with strengths and applications.Bright-Field MicroscopyBright-field microscopy...

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Differential assembly of mouse and human tumor microenvironments.

Nature immunology·2026

Same author

Submicrometre sampling of living cells by macrophages.

Nature·2026

Same author

Local gene editing of fibroblasts in tumors reveals a new cancer-associated fibroblast state.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2026

Same author

The missing data for intelligent scientific instruments.

Nature methods·2025

Same author

Submicron-Sampling of Living Cells by Macrophages.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Dendritic Cells at the Center of Reactive Tumor Immunity.

Immunological reviews·2025

Same journal

Quantification of cell viability by automated analysis of live cell imaging.

Methods in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Flow cytometry evaluation of cytotoxicity exerted by effector immune cells against tumor cells.

Methods in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Time-lapse confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of FOOD formation.

Methods in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Screening and identification of protein-protein interaction using proximity labeling.

Methods in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Quantitative high-content profiling of mitochondrial morphology with automated statistical analysis and integrated data visualization.

Methods in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Super-resolution imaging of cell death in Drosophila tissues via expansion and pan-expansion microscopy.

Methods in cell biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Multiplexed Barcoding Image Analysis for Immunoprofiling and Spatial Mapping Characterization in the Single-Cell Analysis of Paraffin Tissue Samples

Multiplexed Barcoding Image Analysis for Immunoprofiling and Spatial Mapping Characterization in the Single-Cell Analysis of Paraffin Tissue Samples

Published on: April 7, 2023

Assessing and benchmarking multiphoton microscopes for biologists.

Kaitlin Corbin¹, Henry Pinkard¹, Sebastian Peck¹

¹Biological Imaging Development Center and Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Methods in Cell Biology

|June 30, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Multiphoton microscopy performance can be benchmarked using simple methods to assess instrument quality and efficiency. This helps identify performance decay and select optimal features for experimental needs.

Keywords:

Instrumentation Multiphoton imaging Optimization

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

A Custom Multiphoton Microscopy Platform for Live Imaging of Mouse Cornea and Conjunctiva

A Custom Multiphoton Microscopy Platform for Live Imaging of Mouse Cornea and Conjunctiva

Published on: May 17, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Multiplexed Barcoding Image Analysis for Immunoprofiling and Spatial Mapping Characterization in the Single-Cell Analysis of Paraffin Tissue Samples

Multiplexed Barcoding Image Analysis for Immunoprofiling and Spatial Mapping Characterization in the Single-Cell Analysis of Paraffin Tissue Samples

Published on: April 7, 2023

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

A Custom Multiphoton Microscopy Platform for Live Imaging of Mouse Cornea and Conjunctiva

A Custom Multiphoton Microscopy Platform for Live Imaging of Mouse Cornea and Conjunctiva

Published on: May 17, 2020

Area of Science:

Biomedical imaging
Optical microscopy
Cellular and tissue analysis

Background:

Multiphoton microscopy is crucial for in vivo cell tracking due to deep tissue penetration and low phototoxicity.
Instrument performance depends on various factors including laser, optics, detectors, and electronics.
Standardized methods for benchmarking multiphoton microscope quality and efficiency are lacking in current literature.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce simple, standardized parameters and methods for benchmarking multiphoton microscope performance.
To provide tools for assessing instrument quality and efficiency for both users and purchasers.
To aid in identifying performance degradation and selecting appropriate microscope features for specific research requirements.

Main Methods:

Discussion of key performance parameters relevant to multiphoton microscopy.
Proposal of practical methods for in-house performance benchmarking.
Guidance on evaluating microscope components and overall system efficiency.

Main Results:

Established a framework for evaluating multiphoton microscope capabilities.
Demonstrated the utility of proposed methods for performance assessment.
Highlighted the importance of standardized benchmarking for reliable imaging.

Conclusions:

Simple benchmarking methods can effectively assess multiphoton microscope performance and efficiency.
Standardized evaluation aids in maintaining instrument quality and optimizing experimental outcomes.
These methods support informed purchasing decisions and ensure suitability for research needs.