Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Applying lessons learned from the USAID family planning graduation experience to the GAVI graduation process
Angela K Shen1, Marguerite M Farrell2, Mary F Vandenbroucke2
1Bureau for Global Health, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA, Office of Population and Reproductive Health, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA, Office of Country Support, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA and Office of Health Infectious Disease and Nutrition, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA Bureau for Global Health, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA, Office of Population and Reproductive Health, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA, Office of Country Support, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA and Office of Health Infectious Disease and Nutrition, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA ashen@usaid.gov.
Abstract:
As low income countries experience economic transition, characterized by rapid economic growth and increased government spending potential in health, they have increased fiscal space to support and sustain more of their own health programmes, decreasing need for donor development assistance. Phase out of external funds should be systematic and efforts towards this end should concentrate on government commitments towards country ownership and self-sustainability. The 2006 US Agency for International Development (USAID) family planning (FP) graduation strategy is one such example of a systematic phase-out approach. Triggers for graduation were based on pre-determined criteria and programme indicators. In 2011 the GAVI Alliance (formerly the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations) which primarily supports financing of new vaccines, established a graduation policy process. Countries whose gross national income per capita exceeds $1570 incrementally increase their co-financing of new vaccines over a 5-year period until they are no longer eligible to apply for new GAVI funding, although previously awarded support will continue. This article compares and contrasts the USAID and GAVI processes to apply lessons learned from the USAID FP graduation experience to the GAVI process. The findings of the review are 3-fold: (1) FP graduation plans served an important purpose by focusing on strategic needs across six graduation plan foci, facilitating graduation with pre-determined financial and technical benchmarks, (2) USAID sought to assure contraceptive security prior to graduation, phasing out of contraceptive donations first before phasing out from technical assistance in other programme areas and (3) USAID sought to sustain political support to assure financing of products and programmes continue after graduation. Improving sustainability more broadly beyond vaccine financing provides a more comprehensive approach to graduation. The USAID FP experience provides a window into understanding one approach to graduation from donor assistance. The process itself-involving transparent country-level partners well in advance of graduation-appears a valuable lesson towards success.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Population Growth
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

