Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Drug-eluting balloons in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
Kristina Maric Besic1, Maja Strozzi1, Eduard Margetic1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Insights
Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) plus bare-metal stent (BMS) reduced late lumen loss in acute coronary syndrome patients. However, this combination did not significantly impact clinical outcomes compared to BMS alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) management often involves percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Bare-metal stents (BMS) are a common treatment, but in-stent restenosis remains a concern.
- Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) offer a localized drug delivery approach to mitigate restenosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of a combination therapy (BMS + DEB) versus BMS alone in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI.
- To evaluate key angiographic and clinical endpoints, including in-stent restenosis (ISR), late lumen loss (LLL), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 85 patients with NSTEMI or UA.
- Patients were assigned to either BMS alone or BMS + DEB.
- Angiographic follow-up at 6 months assessed primary endpoints: binary ISR and LLL. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), and new acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in binary in-stent restenosis (ISR) between the BMS and BMS+DEB groups (p=0.593).
- Significantly lower late lumen loss (LLL) was observed in the BMS+DEB group compared to BMS alone (p=0.002).
- Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were similar between groups (29.5% vs 24.4%, p=0.835). One case of subacute stent thrombosis occurred in the BMS+DEB group.
Conclusions:
- The combination of BMS and DEB significantly reduces late lumen loss in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI.
- Despite improved angiographic parameters (reduced LLL), the BMS+DEB strategy did not demonstrate a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared to BMS alone at 6-month follow-up.
- Further research may be warranted to explore long-term clinical benefits and patient selection for BMS+DEB therapy.
Background:
We compared efficacy of bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting balloon (DEB) combination vs BMS alone, in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA) were randomized to BMS only or BMS+DEB group. Angiographic follow-up was performed after 6 months. The primary endpoints were binary in-stent restenosis (ISR) and late lumen loss (LLL) and the secondary endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), and new acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Results:
A total of 85 patients were enrolled, 44 (BMS) and 41 (BMS+DEB). The median age was 67 (36-84) years and 68 (80%) were male. Fifty-two patients (61.2%) had NSTEMI and 33 patients (38.8%) UA. There was no difference in patient demographics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics, except for more smokers in the BMS+DEB group 18/41 (43.9%) vs 9/44 (20.5%). At follow-up, no significant difference in binary ISR was found; p=0.593, but LLL was significantly lower in the BMS+DEB group 0.68 (0.00-2.15) mm vs 0.22 (0.00-2.35) mm; p=0.002. The difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate combining TLR, ST, and ACS, between the groups was also non-significant, 29.5% (BMS) vs 24.4% (BMS+DEB); p=0.835. One patient had a subacute ST (BMS+DEB) due to clopidogrel resistance.
Conclusion:
Patients treated with BMS+DEB combination for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome had significantly less LLL in comparison to patients treated with BMS alone but without an impact on patient clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
06:30Complete and Partial Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: May 19, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care