Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026
Improved Rodent Model of Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury
Published on: March 7, 2022
An experimental model of myocardial infarction and controlled reperfusion using a miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass
Sven Peterss1, Sabina Guenther2, Kristina Kellermann3
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Objectives:
Different revascularization strategies for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) exist. It remains unclear whether ventricular unloading using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has an impact on early postischaemic ventricular function. Here, we report on the results of an approach using a miniaturized CPB in a well-established animal model of AMI.
Methods:
In a randomized fashion, 30 male Wistar rats were assigned to temporary left anterior descending (LAD) ligation (30 min) followed by 180 min of reperfusion either with or without 60 min of CPB (70 ml/min, 36°C). The CPB circuit consisted of a venous reservoir, a peristaltic roller pump and a membrane oxygenator with heat exchanger. Cardiac function was measured at 60 and 120 min after reperfusion (F60, F120) using a conductance catheter.
Results:
The mortality rate was 37% (11/30). Thus, 19 animals could be included into the analysis (8 CPB). The mean cardiac output did not differ between the groups at F60 [63 ± 29 vs 54 ± 25 ml/min (CPB), P = 0.56] and F120 [73 ± 27 vs 53 ± 24 ml/min (CPB), P = 0.21]. During reperfusion, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was stable in both the control (F60 37 ± 5% vs F120 33 ± 8%, P = 0.42) and the CPB groups (F60 52 ± 11% vs F120 51 ± 13%, P = 0.71). CPB animals had a significantly better LVEF after reperfusion (F60 P = 0.007, F120 P = 0.01).
Conclusions:
In this animal model of AMI, the establishment of CPB resulted in a significantly better LVEF in comparison with conventional reperfusion only. This beneficial effect may have an impact on revascularization strategies and timing in patients presenting with AMI in the future.
