Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Modeling Neural Immune Signaling of Episodic and Chronic Migraine Using Spreading Depression In Vitro
Published on: June 13, 2011
[Influence of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function of sensitized mice]
Qi-Xiang Ye1, Lu-Hong Xu1, Wei Xu2
1Department of Pediatrics, SUN Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, SUN Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510120,Guangdong Province, China.
Abstract:
This study was aimed to explore the effects of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function of sensitized mice', and provide the evidences of acquired immune tolerance for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The mice sensitized on 7 day before transplant were divided into 4 groups: (1)CTLA4Ig+ anti-CD154 isotype control IgG; (2)anti-CD154 +CTLA4Ig isotype control IgG; (3)CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154; (4)isotype control IgG of CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154. CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 used in normal BALB/c mice as isotype control IgG. Each mouse in all groups received CTLA4Ig and anti-CD154 (or corresponding isotype control IgG) 500 µg respectively, and was injected via tail vein on 7 day before transplant. There were 5 mice in each group. The mice were sacrificed on day 0, then the number of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells, CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- T cells were measured by flow cytometry. Changes of cytokines and sensitized antibody were tested by ELISA or flow cytometry. The results showed that the numbers of CD19(+)CD69(+)B cells were significantly increased in comparison with the normal group (P < 0.01) , whereas the numbers of cells were significantly decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or /and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals (P < 0.01) . Blocking these 2 signals together displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01) . The central memory and effector T cells were defined as CD44(high)/CD62L(high) and CD44(high)/CD62L(low)/- respectively, those increased significantly after sensitized in comparison with those in normal group, whereas their numbers decreased when blocking B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals. Blocking these two signals together, displayed a synergistic effect (P < 0.01). Cytokines, IgG and IgM in all groups were not significantly different. Sensitizing antibody test showed that the fluorescence intensity of sensitized group significantly increased as compared with normal group, whereas fluorescence intensity of CTLA4Ig or/and anti-CD154 treated groups significantly decreased as compared with sensitized group (P < 0.01) . It is concluded that blocking the B7/CD28 or/and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signal can inhibit the cellular and humoral immune function, whereas blocking these two signals together displays a synergistic effect.
Insights
Blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals inhibits immune responses in mice. Combined blockade synergistically reduces B cells, T cells, and antibodies, promoting immune tolerance for transplantation.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Transplantation Immunology
Background:
- Co-stimulatory signals like B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 are crucial for immune activation.
- Understanding these pathways is vital for developing strategies to induce immune tolerance, particularly for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of blocking B7/CD28 and CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals on immune function in sensitized mice.
- To assess the potential of combined blockade for inducing acquired immune tolerance in the context of bone marrow transplantation.
Main Methods:
- Sensitized mice were treated with CTLA4Ig (blocking B7/CD28) and/or anti-CD154 (blocking CD40/CD154) or respective isotype controls.
- Flow cytometry was used to quantify B cells (CD19(+)CD69(+)) and T cell subsets (CD44high/CD62Lhigh central memory; CD44high/CD62Llow effector).
- Cytokine levels, IgG, IgM, and sensitizing antibodies were analyzed using ELISA and flow cytometry.
Main Results:
- Blocking B7/CD28 or CD40/CD154 significantly decreased B cells and T cell subsets compared to sensitized controls.
- Combined blockade of both signals demonstrated a synergistic effect, further reducing immune cell populations.
- Treatment significantly reduced sensitizing antibodies, indicating suppressed humoral immunity.
Conclusions:
- Blocking B7/CD28 and/or CD40/CD154 co-stimulatory signals effectively inhibits cellular and humoral immune responses.
- The combined blockade exhibits a synergistic effect, offering a promising strategy for inducing immune tolerance in transplantation settings.
Related Concept Videos
Functions of the Lymphatic and Immune System
The primary lymphoid organs, including the bone marrow and the thymus, serve as the maturation sites for lymphocytes. Secondary lymphoid organs, like the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, activate these lymphocytes and serve as...
What is the Immune System?
Paracrine Signaling
Endocrine Signaling
Block Diagram Reduction
The first step in this process is the identification and relocation of a branch point. A branch point, where a...
Humoral Immune Responses

