Twenty-Year Experience with Rigid Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Skeletally Immature Patients

Samuel N Crosby1, Elliott J Kim1, Daniel M Koehler2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, 4202 DOT, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN 37232-9565. E-mail address for J.E. Martus: jeff.martus@vanderbilt.edu.

Insights

Rigid intramedullary nailing effectively treats pediatric femoral shaft fractures, showing good functional outcomes and low complication rates. This study confirms its safety and efficacy in young patients.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Traumatology

Background:

  • The safety of rigid intramedullary nailing for pediatric femoral shaft fractures remains debated.
  • This study evaluates functional outcomes and complication rates in skeletally immature patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of rigid intramedullary nailing in treating pediatric femoral shaft fractures.
  • To report functional outcomes and complication rates associated with this surgical technique.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 246 femoral shaft fractures in skeletally immature patients (1987-2009).
  • Analysis of radiographic and clinical data, including Nonarthritic Hip Score and patient surveys.
  • Minimum two-year follow-up for 93 patients to assess growth disturbances and long-term outcomes.

Main Results:

  • 241 patients (246 fractures) with a mean age of 12.9 years; 92% closed fractures.
  • 15.1% showed articulotrochanteric distance increase, with only 2.2% developing asymptomatic coxa valga.
  • Overall complication rate was 9.8% (24/246 fractures), with 1.7% reporting pain at latest follow-up. No femoral head osteonecrosis.
  • Average Nonarthritic Hip Score was 92.4; 100% patient satisfaction.

Conclusions:

  • Rigid intramedullary nailing is a safe and effective treatment for pediatric femoral shaft fractures.
  • The technique yields acceptable complication rates and high patient satisfaction.
  • Functional outcomes are generally good, with minimal clinically relevant growth disturbances.
Abstract