Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

A Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer
Published on: July 6, 2017
ALK and ROS1 overexpression is very rare in colorectal adenocarcinoma
Michelle Houang1, Christopher W Toon, Adele Clarkson
1*Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Northern Translational Cancer Research Unit, Kolling Institute of Medical Research ∥Department of Cytogenetics, PaLMS, Royal North Shore Hospital †Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards ‡Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney §HistoPath Pathology, North Ryde ¶Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Abstract:
Crizotinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown tremendous promise in the treatment of lung adenocarcinomas harboring either ALK or ROS1 rearrangements. Recently, small studies of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) have suggested an incidence of EML4-ALK translocations of 0.4% to 2.4% and FIG-ROS1 translocations of 0.8%. In lung cancer, screening immunohistochemical staining for ALK and ROS1 has been validated as highly sensitive for these translocations, but this has not been investigated in CRC. We therefore sought to investigate the incidence of ALK and ROS1 overexpression as detected by immunohistochemical staining in a large cohort of CRCs. Of the 1889 CRCs, only 1 case (0.05%) demonstrated diffuse strong positive staining for ALK, whereas 14 (0.7%) showed weak nonspecific staining; the remainder were negative. The 1 positive case was confirmed to harbor an ALK rearrangement by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), whereas the 14 tumors with weak staining were FISH-negative. The ALK positive case demonstrated positive expression in all dysplastic and malignant cells indicating that the translocation was an early clonal event. No cases were positive for ROS1 by immunohistochemical staining, although 2 cases did show some nonspecific staining and were shown to be negative for ROS1 translocation by FISH. We conclude that although diffuse strong positive staining for ALK is likely to be highly specific for ALK rearrangement in CRC, both ALK and ROS1 immunohistochemical staining are very low-yield tests and difficult to justify in the routine clinical setting.
Insights
Immunohistochemical staining for ALK and ROS1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare. While ALK overexpression can indicate rearrangements, routine screening is not clinically justified due to low yield.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Pathology
- Cancer Diagnostics
Background:
- Crizotinib targets ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, effective in lung cancer.
- Small studies suggest ALK/ROS1 translocations in colorectal cancer (CRC), but diagnostic utility is unproven.
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a validated screening tool for ALK/ROS1 in lung cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of ALK and ROS1 overexpression via IHC in a large CRC cohort.
- To assess the clinical utility of ALK and ROS1 IHC screening in CRC.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 1889 colorectal cancer (CRC) cases using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for ALK and ROS1.
- Confirmed positive ALK cases with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).
- Evaluated staining patterns for specificity and correlation with translocations.
Main Results:
- One case (0.05%) showed diffuse strong ALK positivity, confirmed as ALK rearrangement by FISH.
- 14 cases (0.7%) exhibited weak, nonspecific ALK staining and were FISH-negative.
- No ROS1 positivity was detected by IHC; 2 cases with nonspecific staining were FISH-negative.
Conclusions:
- Diffuse strong ALK IHC positivity is likely specific for ALK rearrangement in CRC.
- ALK and ROS1 IHC staining demonstrate very low yield in CRC.
- Routine clinical use of ALK and ROS1 IHC screening in CRC is difficult to justify.

