Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-traumatic Iliacus Muscle Hematoma During Anticoagulation Bridging in a Patient With Active Malignancy: A Case of Multifactorial Bleeding Risk.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Editorial: The robot will cath you now.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions·2026
Same author

Long-term outcomes of abnormal global longitudinal left ventricular strain during sepsis: A retrospective cohort study.

Journal of critical care·2026
Same author

Multiorgan Assessment with Transesophageal Ultrasound in Prone Ventilation Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Observational Study in Argentina.

Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine·2025
Same author

Intravascular Imaging vs Angiography Guidance for PCI of Severely Calcified Lesions: The ECLIPSE Trial.

JACC. Cardiovascular interventions·2025
Same author

Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
11:21

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Published on: May 29, 2015

21.6K

Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach.

Nathaniel R Smilowitz1, Jeffrey W Moses, Fernando A Sosa

  • 1Columbia University Medical Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Beyth Street, Jerusalem 91031, Israel. weiszg@szmc.org.il.

The Journal of Invasive Cardiology
|July 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) shows promise for improving outcomes and operator safety. Initial studies indicate robotic PCI does not increase patient radiation or contrast media use compared to traditional PCI.

More Related Videos

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
08:12

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels

Published on: May 26, 2023

2.9K
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
11:21

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Published on: May 29, 2015

21.6K
Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
08:12

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels

Published on: May 26, 2023

2.9K
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Medical Robotics
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) aims to enhance procedural outcomes and operator ergonomics while reducing radiation exposure.
  • Concerns exist regarding potential increases in patient radiation dose and contrast media usage with robotic assistance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare patient radiation exposure, contrast media use, and procedural efficiency between robotic-enhanced PCI and traditional PCI.
  • To address concerns about the safety and efficacy of robotic PCI for patients.

Main Methods:

  • A single-center study comparing 40 patients undergoing robotic-enhanced PCI (CorPath 200 system) with 80 patients undergoing conventional PCI.
  • Patients in both groups had obstructive coronary artery disease and indications for single-vessel PCI.

Main Results:

  • Robotic-enhanced PCI showed trends toward lower fluoroscopy duration (10.1 vs 12.3 min), radiation dose (1389 vs 1665 mGy), and contrast volume (121 vs 137 mL).
  • Conversion to manual PCI was required in only 2 robotic-assisted cases, with all patients achieving <30% residual stenosis.

Conclusions:

  • Initial experience suggests robotic-enhanced PCI is not associated with increased patient radiation or contrast media exposure.
  • Robotic-assisted PCI offers a favorable comparison to the traditional approach, potentially improving safety and outcomes.