Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Building Langmuir Probes and Emissive Probes for Plasma Potential Measurements in Low Pressure, Low Temperature Plasmas
Published on: May 25, 2021
ϕ(2) or not ϕ(2): testing the simplest inflationary potential
Paolo Creminelli1, Diana López Nacir2, Marko Simonović3
1Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste, Italy and Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.
The simplest inflationary model, a quadratic potential, serves as a benchmark. Future constraints can distinguish it from other models and limit deviations in the speed of sound and multi-field contributions.
Area of Science:
- Cosmology
- Inflationary theory
- Particle physics
Background:
- The simplest inflationary model, V=1/2m(2)ϕ(2), is the benchmark for future cosmological constraints.
- Deviations from this minimal scenario can be parametrized by a specific quantity that vanishes for a quadratic potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the implications of future constraints on inflationary models.
- To distinguish between a quadratic potential and a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson model.
- To set limits on the deviation from unity of the speed of sound and the contribution of a second field to perturbations.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a specific quantity related to the spectral index (n(s)) and tensor-to-scalar ratio (r).
- Calculation of bounds on physical parameters based on future observational uncertainties.
- Discussion of the impact of non-Gaussianity in light of recent BICEP2 results.
Main Results:
- The quantity (n(s)-1)+r/4+11(n(s)-1)(2)/24 vanishes for a quadratic potential (up to cubic slow-roll corrections).
- Future constraints can differentiate a quadratic potential from a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson model (f≲30Mpl).
- Limits are set on |c(s)-1|≲3×10(-2) (Λ≳2×10(16) GeV) and second field contributions ≲6×10(-2).
Conclusions:
- The uncertainty in the spectral index is the limiting factor for these bounds.
- The error on the number of e-folds (ΔN≃0.4) implies an error on reheating temperature (ΔT(rh)/T(rh)≃1.2).
- The relevance of non-Gaussianity is discussed in the context of BICEP2 findings.
Related Concept Videos
Calculations of Electric Potential I
The ring is divided into infinitesimal small arcs such that point M is equidistant from all the arcs. Here, the cylindrical coordinate system is used to calculate the electric potential at point M. A general element of the arc between angles θ and θ + dθ is of the length Rdθ and...
Calculations of Electric Potential II
Consider a...
Potential-Energy Criterion for Equilibrium
Thermodynamic Potentials
Magnetic Vector Potential
Consider an ideal solenoid with n turns per unit length and radius R. If I is the current through the solenoid, the magnetic field inside the solenoid is expressed as the product of vacuum...
Potential Energy
Chemical bonds that form attractive forces between atoms also contain potential energy, called chemical energy. When a chemical reaction...

