Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preterm birth prevention in a rural practice.

B P Yawn1, R A Yawn

  • 1Worthington Medical Center, MN.

JAMA
|July 14, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erratum to: Scaling up strategies of the chronic respiratory disease programme of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (Action Plan B3: Area 5).

Clinical and translational allergy·2017
Same author

ARIA 2016: Care pathways implementing emerging technologies for predictive medicine in rhinitis and asthma across the life cycle.

Clinical and translational allergy·2017
Same author

Scaling up strategies of the chronic respiratory disease programme of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (Action Plan B3: Area 5).

Clinical and translational allergy·2016
Same author

MACVIA-ARIA Sentinel NetworK for allergic rhinitis (MASK-rhinitis): the new generation guideline implementation.

Allergy·2015
Same author

Integrated care pathways for airway diseases (AIRWAYS-ICPs).

The European respiratory journal·2014
Same author

Development and validation of the chronic hepatitis C virus treatment satisfaction (HCVTSat) instrument.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2013
Same journal

Deescalation, Discontinuation, and Deimplementation Trials: Evaluating Whether and How to Do Less.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for GERD.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

The Psychedelic Therapies Executive Order: On Approval and Clinical Readiness.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

"Suturing": Love, Death, and Perfection's Limits.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

What Is Low Back Pain?

JAMA·2026
Same journal

From Silicon Valley to the Vatican-The Expanding Debate on AI Ethics.

JAMA·2026
See all related articles

A community-based preterm birth prevention program significantly reduced preterm births by 60% through education and reassessment of low-risk women. This initiative improved infant outcomes and increased timely treatment for preterm labor.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health
  • Neonatal Care

Background:

  • Preterm birth remains a significant challenge in maternal and infant health.
  • Existing prevention programs may not adequately address needs in nonurban settings.
  • Targeting "low-risk" populations with enhanced education is a potential strategy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate an educational preterm birth prevention program for small, nonurban communities.
  • To assess the program's impact on preterm birth rates and neonatal outcomes.
  • To determine the cost-effectiveness and applicability of the program in rural primary care.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a community-based program focusing on education and reassessment of "low-risk" women.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of preterm birth rates during a 3-year control period versus a 2-year study period.
  • Analysis of neonatal outcomes, including birth weight and NICU admissions, and assessment of tocolysis and delivery timing.

    • Main Results:

    • A 60% reduction in the potentially preventable preterm birth rate, from 3.2% to 1.3%.
    • Preterm neonates born during the study period were older, had higher birth weights, and fewer NICU admissions.
    • Significant increases in early presentation for tocolysis (51% to 98%) and term delivery after preterm labor (56% to 96%).

    Conclusions:

    • An education-focused preterm birth prevention program is effective and inexpensive for nonurban communities.
    • The program demonstrated significant improvements in preterm birth rates and neonatal outcomes.
    • This model is potentially applicable to similar rural primary care practices, emphasizing increased awareness and education.