Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Informed consent in emergency research. Prehospital thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction
P S Grim1, P A Singer, G P Gramelspacher
1Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, IL 60637.
Abstract:
Can the conscious patient in the midst of a medical emergency provide adequate informed consent for a clinical research protocol? Adequate consent is crucial to the ethical conduct of clinical trials, including those performed in emergency settings. We examine the problem of emergency informed consent. As an illustrative case, we discuss a pilot trial of prehospital thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction. Federal regulations for clinical research do not provide clear guidelines on emergency research in the conscious patient. Clinical investigators currently approach emergency consent in four ways: (1) avoid such research, (2) omit the consent process, (3) obtain deferred consent, or (4) obtain customary consent. We suggest a fifth alternative, two-step consent, which permits the conduct of emergency research while protecting the rights of the emergency research subjects. Such a process may serve as an alternative solution for future studies faced with the problem of informed consent in emergencies.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

