Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Translational Applications of Stimulated SFEMG in Rodent Models
Published on: March 8, 2024
EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil to prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements in children
Hye Jin Park1, Hyoseok Kang1, Eu-Gene Kim1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Eulji Hospital, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Remifentanil effectively prevents rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements in children during anesthesia induction. An effect-site concentration of 3.1 ng/ml is recommended to prevent these movements.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Anesthesia
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Rocuronium injection causes significant pain and withdrawal movements in 60-100% of patients.
- These movements during anesthesia induction can be harmful.
- Remifentanil has shown promise in mitigating rocuronium-induced pain and movements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil for preventing rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements in pediatric patients.
- To establish optimal remifentanil dosing for safe anesthesia induction.
Main Methods:
- 171 pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled.
- Remifentanil was administered via target-controlled infusion, with effect-site concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 ng/ml.
- Withdrawal movements were assessed using a 4-point scale after propofol and rocuronium administration.
Main Results:
- The study determined the EC50 of remifentanil to be 1.69 ng/ml (95% CI, 1.42-1.87).
- The EC95 was calculated to be 3.11 ng/ml (95% CI, 2.79-3.72).
- A logistic regression model described the probability of preventing withdrawal movements based on remifentanil concentration.
Conclusions:
- An effect-site target concentration of 3.1 ng/ml for remifentanil effectively prevents rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements in children.
- This finding supports the use of remifentanil for smoother anesthesia induction in pediatric patients.
Background:
Intravenous administration of rocuronium induces intense pain in most patients (60-100%). This could be harmful during anesthesia induction because of the unintended reflex movement of an unconscious patient in response to the pain. Previous studies have reported that remifentanil effectively reduces rocuronium-induced pain and withdrawal movements. This study was designed to evaluate the EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil to prevent withdrawal movements in children.
Methods:
We enrolled a total of 171 pediatric patients scheduled for general anesthesia in this study. Remifentanil was administrated by target-controlled infusion. Effect-site target concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 ng/ml. At each concentration, experiments were repeated in 10-20 patients. Propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg were administrated after equilibration of plasma and effect-site target remifentanil concentration. The withdrawal movements were graded on a 4-point scale. The EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil to prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements were determined by using a logistic regression model.
Results:
The logistic regression model showed that the probability of preventing rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement was as follows: exp (-3.49 + 2.07 × remifentanil concentration) / (1 + exp [-3.49 + 2.07 × remifentanil concentration]). EC50 and EC95 were 1.69 ng/ml (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.42-1.87) and 3.11 ng/ml (95% CIs, 2.79-3.72), respectively.
Conclusions:
Administration of remifentanil at an effect-site target concentration of 3.1 ng/ml could effectively prevent rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements.
More Related Videos
08:49Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
Published on: October 16, 2013
03:02Application of Dixon's Up-and-Down Design to Estimate the Minimum Alveolar Concentration of Sevoflurane in Rats with Refined Movement Classification
Published on: July 25, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...