Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

581
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
581
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

705
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
705
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

788
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
788
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

490
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
490

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tool for Converting ADHD Rating Scales Scores Based on Individual Participant Data from 53 Randomized Controlled Trials of ADHD Medications.

Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

The impact of using different random-effects models in meta-analysis: a case study on the cognitive functioning of preterm-born children.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Comparison of overall survival across treatment modalities for oesophageal, gastroesophageal, and gastric cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same author

NMAstudio 2.0: An interactive tool for network meta-analysis to enhance understanding, interpretation, and communication of the findings.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Producing treatment hierarchies in network meta-analysis using probabilistic models and treatment-choice criteria.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Guidance for manuscript submissions testing the use of generative AI for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Digital cognitive-behavioural therapy to reduce suicidal ideation and behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Evidence-based mental health·2022
Same journal

Risk prediction model for cardiovascular diseases in adults initiating pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Evidence-based mental health·2022
Same journal

Carpe diem.

Evidence-based mental health·2022
Same journal

Associations between antipsychotics and risk of violent crimes and suicidal behaviour in personality disorder.

Evidence-based mental health·2022
Same journal

COP27 climate change conference: urgent action needed for Africa and the world.

Evidence-based mental health·2022
Same journal

Can we mitigate the psychological impacts of social isolation using behavioural activation? Long-term results of the UK BASIL urgent public health COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial and living systematic review.

Evidence-based mental health·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Addressing missing outcome data in meta-analysis.

Dimitris Mavridis1, Anna Chaimani2, Orestis Efthimiou2

  • 1Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Evidence-Based Mental Health
|July 11, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Missing outcome data in meta-analyses can bias results. This paper reviews methods to handle missing data, highlighting statistical models as a robust approach to assess the impact of missingness on review findings.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

82.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

82.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Health Research Methodology

Background:

  • Missing outcome data are prevalent in clinical trials and systematic reviews, potentially compromising precision and introducing bias.
  • Systematic reviewers often rely on trial-level handling of missing data, but suboptimal methods like complete case analysis can exacerbate the issue in meta-analyses.
  • The impact of missing data on meta-analysis results is contingent on the underlying missingness mechanism, with the 'missing at random' assumption often being unverifiable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and illustrate various methods for accounting for missing outcome data within systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • To evaluate the performance and limitations of different approaches to handling missing data in quantitative synthesis.

Main Methods:

  • The study discusses five methods: complete case analysis, imputation from observed data, best/worst-case scenarios, uncertainty intervals for summary estimates, and a statistical model linking treatment effects in observed and missing data.
  • Examples are provided to demonstrate the application and outcomes of each method.

Main Results:

  • Complete case analysis yields imprecise and potentially biased results.
  • Best/worst-case scenarios produce unrealistic estimates, and uncertainty intervals tend to be overly conservative.
  • Imputation methods may underestimate standard errors by not fully accounting for uncertainty.
  • A statistical model effectively reduces the influence of studies with substantial missing data by linking treatment effects.

Conclusions:

  • Pre-emptive methods used in individual trials are not directly applicable to systematic reviews and meta-analyses for missing outcome data.
  • Statistical techniques, such as those in STATA, can quantify deviations from the 'missing at random' assumption and adjust results.
  • Sensitivity analyses, exploring varying assumptions about the relationship between observed and unobserved data parameters, are crucial for assessing the robustness of meta-analysis findings.