Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.3K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.0K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.0K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

848
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
848
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.4K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.4K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

11.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

14.7K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
14.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Studying Parole Revocation Practices: Accounting for Dependency Between Competing Events.

Evaluation review·2024
Same author

Estimating the Distribution of Treatment Effects From Random Design Experiments.

Evaluation review·2020
Same author

Improving Disparity Research by Imputing Missing Data in Health Care Records.

Health services research·2015
Same author

Improving prediction of fall risk among nursing home residents using electronic medical records.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2015
Same author

Change in perceived health insurance coverage among people with multiple sclerosis.

International journal of MS care·2014
Same author

Regression discontinuity design in criminal justice evaluation: an introduction and illustration.

Evaluation review·2014
Same journal

Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Teacher-AI Collaboration to Support Assessment and Feedback: A Case Study in Norwegian Secondary Education.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Transparency, Ethical Framing, and User Agency as Determinants of Trust in AI-Mediated Assessment: Informing the Design of Trustworthy Systems.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

No Evidence that Banning the Purchase of Sex Increases Rape: A Replication Study of Ciacci (2024, 2025).

Evaluation review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'
10:31

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'

Published on: February 10, 2017

10.5K

Pairwise cluster randomization: an exposition.

William Rhodes1

  • 1Abt Associates Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA bill_rhodes@abtassoc.com.

Evaluation Review
|July 13, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pairwise cluster randomization (PCR) offers a more efficient alternative to standard cluster randomization (CR) for program evaluation. This study demonstrates how design choices can mitigate bias and identification issues, making PCR a viable option for smaller cluster numbers.

Keywords:
content areadesign and evaluation of programs and policiesmethodological developmentoutcome evaluation (other than economic evaluation)

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

41.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'
10:31

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'

Published on: February 10, 2017

10.5K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

41.3K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Program Evaluation Methodology

Background:

  • Cluster randomization (CR) is commonly employed for program evaluation when simple random assignment is not feasible.
  • Pairwise cluster randomization (PCR) presents a more efficient design but faces challenges related to bias and identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the bias and identification problems associated with PCR.
  • To demonstrate how design choices can mitigate these issues.
  • To show how Monte Carlo procedures can test the suitability of PCR.

Main Methods:

  • Presentation of formulas illustrating PCR estimator bias and standard error identification issues.
  • Discussion of design strategies to address bias and identification.
  • Utilization of Monte Carlo simulations to compare CR and PCR suitability.

Main Results:

  • Formulas derived to quantify PCR bias and identify standard error issues.
  • Demonstration that specific design choices can effectively mitigate identified problems.
  • Monte Carlo simulations provide a method for selecting between CR and PCR at the design stage.

Conclusions:

  • Advocates for increased adoption of the PCR design.
  • PCR is most suitable for evaluations with a limited number of clusters and available baseline data.
  • PCR is a compelling alternative to CR, especially when dealing with approximately 26 clusters.