A genome-wide association study to identify genomic modulators of rate control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Matthew J Kolek1, Todd L Edwards2, Raafia Muhammad1
1Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract:
For many patients with atrial fibrillation, ventricular rate control with atrioventricular (AV) nodal blockers is considered first-line therapy, although response to treatment is highly variable. Using an extreme phenotype of failure of rate control necessitating AV nodal ablation and pacemaker implantation, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genomic modulators of rate control therapy. Cases included 95 patients who failed rate control therapy. Controls (n = 190) achieved adequate rate control therapy with ≤2 AV nodal blockers using a conventional clinical definition. Genotyping was performed on the Illumina 610-Quad platform, and results were imputed to the 1000 Genomes reference haplotypes. A total of 554,041 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) met criteria for minor allele frequency (>0.01), call rate (>95%), and quality control, and 6,055,224 SNPs were available after imputation. No SNP reached the canonical threshold for significance for GWAS of p <5 × 10(-8). Sixty-three SNPs with p <10(-5) at 6 genomic loci were genotyped in a validation cohort of 130 cases and 157 controls. These included 6q24.3 (near SAMD5/SASH1, p = 9.36 × 10(-8)), 4q12 (IGFBP7, p = 1.75 × 10(-7)), 6q22.33 (C6orf174, p = 4.86 × 10(-7)), 3p21.31 (CDCP1, p = 1.18 × 10(-6)), 12p12.1 (SOX5, p = 1.62 × 10(-6)), and 7p11 (LANCL2, p = 6.51 × 10(-6)). However, none of these were significant in the replication cohort or in a meta-analysis of both cohorts. In conclusion, we identified several potentially important genomic modulators of rate control therapy in atrial fibrillation, particularly SOX5, which was previously associated with heart rate at rest and PR interval. However, these failed to reach genome-wide significance.
More Related Videos
08:05Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022