Ranibizumab versus mitomycin C in primary trabeculectomy--a pilot study

Michael J Pro1, Kathryn B Freidl, Christopher J Neylan

  • 1Department of Glaucoma, Wills Eye Hospital , Philadelphia, PA , USA .

Current Eye Research
|July 15, 2014
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study compared ranibizumab to mitomycin C for glaucoma surgery. Ranibizumab required more glaucoma surgeries, indicating it may be less effective than mitomycin C for primary trabeculectomy.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Glaucoma Surgery
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors

Background:

  • Mitomycin C (MMC) is the standard adjunctive agent in primary trabeculectomy.
  • MMC is associated with known complications.
  • Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents offer a potential alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of using the anti-VEGF agent ranibizumab as an alternative to MMC in primary trabeculectomy.
  • To compare the clinical outcomes of ranibizumab versus MMC adjunctive use.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized, open-label study.
  • 24 consecutive patients undergoing primary trabeculectomy.
  • Comparison of ranibizumab versus MMC (0.4 mg/ml) as adjunctive agents.

Main Results:

  • No significant baseline differences between groups.
  • Higher intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in the ranibizumab group at 1 month (p=0.002).
  • Reduced bleb extent in the ranibizumab group at 6 months (p=0.006).
  • Increased need for hypotensive medication in the ranibizumab group at 3 months (p=0.011).

Conclusions:

  • While no significant IOP or medication differences were observed at one year, ranibizumab use led to a higher rate of subsequent glaucoma surgeries.
  • Ranibizumab may be less effective than MMC in achieving long-term IOP control in primary trabeculectomy.