Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Physician continuity improves outcomes for heart failure patients treated and released from the emergency department
Robinder S Sidhu1, Erik Youngson2, Finlay A McAlister3
1Division of General Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Objectives:
The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of physician continuity for patients with heart failure (HF) treated and released from the emergency department (ED).
Background:
Although current guidelines recommend early follow-up after hospital discharge, it is unclear if it is beneficial in patients sent home from the ED and whether this follow-up should be with a familiar physician.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort of all adults treated and released from 93 EDs in Alberta, Canada, from 1999 to 2009 with a first-time most responsible diagnosis of HF. Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates for post-ED outpatient visits were used.
Results:
In 12,285 patients (mean age 74.9 years), the rate of death or all-cause hospitalization at 6 months was lower in those who saw a familiar physician (37.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83 to 0.96]) in the first month versus those with no outpatient visits (58.1%; aHR: 1.00 [referent]) or visits only with unfamiliar physicians (40.2%; aHR: 1.04 [95% CI: 0.94 to 1.15]). Taking into account all outpatient visits over each observation period and excluding those without follow-up, death or hospitalization was less common in those patients being followed up by a familiar physician (aHR of 0.79 [95% CI: 0.71 to 0.89] at 3 months; aHR of 0.86 [95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95] at 6 months; and aHR of 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80 to 0.96] at 12 months compared with unfamiliar physician follow-up). Any follow-up within 30 days of ED release was associated with a lower risk of repeat ED visit or death at 6 months (aHR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.73 to 0.82] for familiar physicians; aHR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.72 to 0.86] for unfamiliar physicians).
Conclusions:
Early follow-up after an ED visit is associated with better outcomes, particularly if conducted with a familiar physician.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions