Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coinvasional disruptions to island pollinator networks.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

A self-supervised framework for laboratory data imputation in electronic health records.

Communications medicine·2025
Same author

Efficient and Generalizable Prediction of Molecular Alterations in Multiple-Cancer Cohorts Using Hematoxylin and Eosin Whole Slide Images.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc·2024
Same author

Evolving From Discrete Molecular Data Integrations to Actionable Molecular Insights Within the Electronic Health Record.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2024
Same author

Development and validation of a deep learning-based microsatellite instability predictor from prostate cancer whole-slide images.

NPJ precision oncology·2024
Same author

Prediction of MET Overexpression in Lung Adenocarcinoma from Hematoxylin and Eosin Images.

The American journal of pathology·2024
Same journal

RNA-ligand complexes and the attenuation of neutral confinement in the evolution of RNA secondary structures.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same journal

Individual detachment-reintegration events in homing pigeon flocks and the dominance of directional adjustment in their kinematic features.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same journal

Thermal stress disrupts symbiotic fluid dynamics in bobtail squid.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same journal

Distinct geometrical landscapes distinguish between modes of tristability in gene regulatory networks.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same journal

Slow modulation of the contraction patterns in Physarum polycephalum.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same journal

Moo-ving mountains: grazing agents drive terracette formation on steep hillslopes.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

10.9K

Ants work harder during consensus decision-making in small groups.

Adam L Cronin1, Martin C Stumpe2

  • 1United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Iwate University, 3-18-8 Ueda, Morioka 020-8550, Japan adamcronin@gmail.com.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
|July 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Small ant colonies enhance decision-making by increasing individual effort, compensating for fewer members. This strategy may improve accuracy but could increase vulnerability to stress.

Keywords:
AnTracksFormicidaegroup-sizehouse-huntingswarm intelligence

More Related Videos

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi
06:44

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

7.1K
A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants
08:10

A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants

Published on: October 12, 2018

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

10.9K
Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi
06:44

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

7.1K
A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants
08:10

A Visual Guide for Studying Behavioral Defenses to Pathogen Attacks in Leaf-Cutting Ants

Published on: October 12, 2018

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Social Decision-Making

Background:

  • Social groups often exhibit enhanced decision-making, known as the 'wisdom of the crowds' effect, due to pooled information.
  • Limited data exist on how group size impacts consensus decision-making in animals, particularly regarding compensatory mechanisms in smaller groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how group size influences individual contributions to collective decision-making.
  • To examine compensatory strategies employed by smaller groups to maintain decision accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized interactive computer vision software to analyze individual participation in consensus decision-making.
  • Studied house-hunting behavior in different sized groups of the ant Myrmecina nipponica.

Main Results:

  • Individuals in smaller colonies of Myrmecina nipponica invested greater effort in the consensus decision process compared to those in larger colonies.
  • This increased individual effort in smaller groups may lead to better-informed decisions, potentially ameliorating the disadvantages of smaller group size.

Conclusions:

  • Smaller groups may compensate for reduced numbers by increasing individual engagement in collective decision-making.
  • While enhancing decision accuracy, this strategy might make smaller groups more susceptible to external stressors.