DFT + U investigation of charged point defects and clusters in UO2
Emerson Vathonne1, Julia Wiktor, Michel Freyss
1CEA, DEN, DEC, Centre de Cadarache, 13108, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France.
Abstract:
We present a physically justified formalism for the calculation of point defects and cluster formation energies in UO2. The accessible ranges of chemical potentials of the two components U and O are calculated using the U-O experimental phase diagram and a constraint on the formation energies of vacancies. We then apply this formalism to the DFT + U investigation of the point defects and cluster defects in this material (including charged ones). The most stable charge states obtained for these defects near stoichiometry are consistent with a strongly ionic system. Calculations predict similarly low formation energies for V(U)(4)(-) and I(O)(2)(-) in hyperstoichiometric UO2. In stoichiometric UO2, V(O)(2)(+) and I(o)(@)(-) have the same formation energy in the middle of the gap and in hypostoichiometric UO2, V[Formula: see text] is the most stable defect.
Related Concept Videos
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Point, Line and Plane Defects
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Non-Stoichiometric Defects
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...


