Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Scalable Drug Screening Protocol for Efficient Discovery of M. abscessus Treatments
Published on: October 25, 2024
Ceftazidime for neutropenic fevers: is it still an appropriate choice?
1Jefferson University Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract:
Infection continues to rank as a primary cause of treatment-related mortality in patients with cancer. For patients with neutropenic fevers, immediate empiric treatment with antibiotics is standard care. However, which specific antibiotic is best for initial treatment of high-risk patients has been much debated without consensus. Many major health centers use intravenous ceftazidime as first-line therapy for these patients. Yet updates to guidelines published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network suggest that ceftazidime may no longer be an optimal choice. This article reviews the literature regarding ceftazidime therapy for the treatment of high-risk neutropenic patients with fevers. This critical analysis of existing research reveals significant pharmacologic, physiologic, social, and financial implications, and recommendations for further studies are made.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations

