Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

1.7K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
1.7K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

11.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
11.7K
Kruskal-Wallis Test01:19

Kruskal-Wallis Test

1.3K
The Kruskal-Wallis test, also known as the Kruskal-Wallis H test, serves as a nonparametric alternative to the one-way ANOVA, offering a solution for analyzing the differences across three or more independent groups based on a single, ordinal-dependent variable. This statistical test is particularly valuable in scenarios where the data does not meet the normal distribution assumption required by its parametric counterparts. Kruskal-Wallis test is designed typically to handle ordinal data or...
1.3K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.0K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.0K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

2.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2026
Same author

Pooled testing for TB: revisiting a cost-saving innovation.

The Lancet. Respiratory medicine·2025
Same author

Performance of Urine Reagent Test Strips in Detecting <i>Schistosoma haematobium</i> Infection in Individual and Pooled Urine Samples.

Microorganisms·2025
Same author

A mixed-effects Bayesian regression model for multivariate group testing data.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Bayesian Additive Regression Trees for Group Testing Data.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Regression analysis of group-tested current status data.

Biometrika·2024
Same journal

Doubly regularized generalized linear models for spatial observations with high-dimensional covariates.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Fisher's method using weakly geometric grid for combining <i>p</i>-values with application to COVID-19 surveillance.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Robust domain selection for functional data via interval-wise testing and effect size mapping.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Modelling spatial heterogeneity in exposure buffers and risk: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Estimating the causal effects of multiple intermittent treatments with application to COVID-19.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Precision Mental Health: Predicting Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Depression through Data Integration.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

10.9K

Group testing in heterogeneous populations by using halving algorithms.

Michael S Black1, Christopher R Bilder1, Joshua M Tebbs2

  • 1University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied Statistics
|July 19, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Group testing can be more efficient by accounting for individual risk differences. Tailoring subgroup assignments based on risk probabilities significantly reduces the total number of tests needed for infectious disease screening.

Keywords:
Binary responseClassificationIdentificationPooled testingRetestingScreening

More Related Videos

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations
09:34

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

6.0K
Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish
05:41

Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish

Published on: January 28, 2020

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

10.9K
A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations
09:34

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

6.0K
Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish
05:41

Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish

Published on: January 28, 2020

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Group testing reduces the number of diagnostic tests required for large populations.
  • Traditional group testing assumes uniform individual risk, overlooking population heterogeneity.
  • Recent research explores group testing in heterogeneous populations with varying individual risk probabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of population heterogeneity on the 'halving' group testing procedure.
  • To develop and evaluate novel group testing strategies that leverage individual risk information.
  • To assess the efficiency of risk-based subgroup assignment in reducing overall testing needs.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the 'halving' group testing algorithm under conditions of population heterogeneity.
  • Development of modified group testing procedures incorporating individual risk probabilities for subgroup assignment.
  • Application and validation of proposed methods using real-world screening data for chlamydia and gonorrhoea.

Main Results:

  • Population heterogeneity does not alter the mean number of tests when individuals are randomly assigned to subgroups.
  • Assigning individuals to subgroups based on their risk probabilities significantly reduces the total number of tests required.
  • The proposed risk-aware group testing strategy demonstrates practical utility with Nebraska's STD screening data.

Conclusions:

  • Acknowledging and utilizing population heterogeneity can enhance the efficiency of group testing procedures.
  • Risk-based subgroup assignment in group testing offers a significant advantage over random assignment, particularly in heterogeneous populations.
  • The findings have implications for optimizing infectious disease screening programs and resource allocation.