Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Weaknesses in regional primary coronary angioplasty programs: is there still a role for a pharmaco-invasive approach?
Nicolas Danchin1, Nelson Dos Santos Teixeira1, Etienne Puymirat1
1Département de Cardiologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris and Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Insights
The pharmaco-invasive strategy, combining fibrinolysis with timely intervention, offers a viable alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. This approach improves outcomes and complements primary percutaneous coronary intervention networks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the guideline-recommended reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Initial trials compared primary percutaneous coronary intervention with intravenous fibrinolysis alone.
- Subsequent research demonstrated improved outcomes with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention and routine angiography after fibrinolysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the pharmaco-invasive strategy as an alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI.
- To assess the efficacy of the pharmaco-invasive strategy when primary percutaneous coronary intervention is delayed.
- To explore the role of the pharmaco-invasive strategy in complementing existing STEMI treatment networks.
Main Methods:
- Review of randomized trials, including the STREAM trial.
- Analysis of real-world data, specifically the FAST-MI registry.
- Comparison of pharmaco-invasive strategy outcomes with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Main Results:
- The pharmaco-invasive strategy, when applied appropriately, shows favorable outcomes compared to primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
- This strategy is a valid alternative when primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be performed within recommended timeframes.
- Long-term data supports the effectiveness of the pharmaco-invasive approach.
Conclusions:
- The pharmaco-invasive strategy is a crucial alternative for STEMI reperfusion, especially when primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not feasible.
- Implementing pharmaco-invasive protocols can enhance the resilience and effectiveness of STEMI treatment networks.
- This strategy offers a valuable option to improve patient outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction care.
Abstract:
All guidelines recommend primary percutaneous coronary intervention as the default strategy for achieving reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. These recommendations are based upon randomized trials which compared primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stand-alone intravenous fibrinolysis. Since the time these trials were performed, however, it has been shown in further trials that use of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in patients without signs of reperfusion after lysis, and routine coronary angiography within 24 h of the administration of lysis for all other patients, substantially improved the results of intravenous fibrinolytic treatment. This has led to proposing the pharmaco-invasive strategy as an alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Actually, it is not uncommon that circumstances prevent performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the recommended time limits set by the guidelines. In such cases, using a pharmaco-invasive strategy may constitute a valid alternative. Both the STREAM randomized trial and real-world experience, in particular the long-term results from the FAST-MI registry, suggest that the pharmaco-invasive strategy, when used in an appropriate population, compares favorably with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Therefore, implementing a pharmaco-invasive strategy protocol may be an important complement to compensate for potential weaknesses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction networks.
More Related Videos
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care