Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
Published on: October 17, 2025
Accuracy and complications of posterior C2 screw fixation using intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based
Xiaohui Tao1, Wei Tian1, Bo Liu1
1Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University Fourth Clinical Medical College, Beijing 100035, China.
Background:
The peculiar and highly variable C2 anatomy can make screw fixation more challenging and prone to potential vertebral artery or neurologic injury. Conventional C-arm fluoroscopy has several drawbacks. The aim of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of posterior C2 screw fixation using intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation (ITFN) and assess the perioperative complication rate related to screw placement.
Methods:
A retrospective review identified patients who underwent operative management with C2 instruments using ITFN at our hospital between January 2006 and December 2012. Clinical data were obtained from medical records and final screw positions were graded according to a modified classification of Gertzbein and Robbins. Grade A and B screws were considered well positioned.
Results:
The study included 99 patients (53 males and 46 females) who underwent posterior C2 screw fixation using ITFN. The mean Japan Orthopedic Association score improved from (6.7 ± 1.9) points before surgery to (12.5 ± 2.7) points at 6-month follow-up (z = +8.628, P < 0.01). The mean visual analogue scale improved from (4.1 ± 1.2) points before surgery to (0.7 ± 0.9) points at 6-month follow-up, with an improvement of 83.7% (z = 8.638, P < 0.01). Of the 196 screws analyzed using computed tomography and chart review, 126 transarticular, 64 pedicle, and 6 pars screws were placed with 82.5% (104/126), 89.1% (57/64), and 100% (6/6) accuracy (grade A), respectively; 98.5% (193/196) of screws were grade A or B (grade C, 1.5% (3/196)), and no neurologic injuries occurred. In normal C2 cases, 93 transarticulars and 47 pedicles were placed with high accuracy rates of 90.3% (84/93) and 93.6% (44/47) (grade A), respectively. However, in cases with C2 deformity, 33 transarticular, 17 pedicle, and 6 pars screws were placed with only 60.6% (20/33), 76.5% (13/17), and 100% (6/6) accuracy (grade A), respectively.
Conclusion:
ITFN is a safe, accurate, and effective tool for posterior C2 fixation.
More Related Videos
05:37Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021