Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
Vascular access for hemodialysis: current perspectives
Domenico Santoro1, Filippo Benedetto2, Placido Mondello3
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Nephrology, University of Messina, Italy.
Insights
Vascular access for hemodialysis includes native arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), grafts, and central venous catheters (CVC). AVFs are preferred for longevity and fewer complications, while CVCs carry higher infection and hospitalization risks.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Vascular Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Efficient hemodialysis (HD) relies on well-functioning vascular access (VA).
- Key VA types include native arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheter (CVC).
- Guidelines recommend AVF as the primary choice for chronic HD due to superior longevity and lower morbidity/mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the different types of vascular access for hemodialysis.
- To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each access type.
- To emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary VA team for optimal patient care.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of vascular access types for hemodialysis.
- Comparison of complication rates, longevity, and infection risks associated with AVF, grafts, and CVCs.
- Discussion of optimal insertion sites and associated risks for CVCs, considering comorbidities like pacemakers.
Main Results:
- Native arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) offer the best longevity and lowest complication rates.
- Central venous catheters (CVCs) are associated with higher risks of infection (30-60% removal rate) and hospitalization.
- Subclavian vein insertion for CVCs carries a high thrombosis risk, with overall CVC complications ranging from 5% to 19%.
Conclusions:
- AVF remains the preferred vascular access for chronic hemodialysis.
- Careful risk-benefit assessment is crucial for CVC insertion, especially in patients with implanted devices.
- A multidisciplinary vascular access team is essential for providing optimal care to hemodialysis patients.
Abstract:
A well-functioning vascular access (VA) is a mainstay to perform an efficient hemodialysis (HD) procedure. There are three main types of access: native arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheter (CVC). AVF, described by Brescia and Cimino, remains the first choice for chronic HD. It is the best access for longevity and has the lowest association with morbidity and mortality, and for this reason AVF use is strongly recommended by guidelines from different countries. Once autogenous options have been exhausted, prosthetic fistulae become the second option of maintenance HD access alternatives. CVCs have become an important adjunct in maintaining patients on HD. The preferable locations for insertion are the internal jugular and femoral veins. The subclavian vein is considered the third choice because of the high risk of thrombosis. Complications associated with CVC insertion range from 5% to 19%. Since an increasing number of patients have implanted pacemakers and defibrillators, usually inserted via the subclavian vein and superior vena cava into the right heart, a careful assessment of risk and benefits should be taken. Infection is responsible for the removal of about 30%-60% of HD CVCs, and hospitalization rates are higher among patients with CVCs than among AVF ones. Proper VA maintenance requires integration of different professionals to create a VA team. This team should include a nephrologist, radiologist, vascular surgeon, infectious disease consultant, and members of the dialysis staff. They should provide their experience in order to give the best options to uremic patients and the best care for their VA.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

