Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Anesthesia and Intubation of Preadolescent Mouse Pups for Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published on: June 2, 2022
Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and
Mohammad-Reza Ghane, Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh, Sadrollah Mahmoudi
1Department of Paediatrics' Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Insights
Both intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV) midazolam are effective and safe for pediatric procedural sedation in emergency departments (ED). IV midazolam acts faster, but IM is a viable option when IV access is difficult.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Anesthesiology
Background:
- Sedation in pediatric emergency departments (ED) is a complex issue.
- Midazolam, a benzodiazepine, is frequently used for procedural sedation in children.
- Comparing intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV) midazolam administration is crucial for optimizing pediatric sedation protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of intramuscular (IM) versus intravenous (IV) midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate sedation, cooperation, and irritation scores.
- To assess the safety profile, including vital signs and oxygen saturation.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 30 children in each of two matched groups.
- Group 1 received intramuscular midazolam (0.3 mg/kg).
- Group 2 received intravenous midazolam (0.15 mg/kg).
- Effectiveness was assessed via sedation, irritation, and cooperation scores every 15 minutes for 60 minutes.
- Safety was monitored through vital signs and oxygen saturation.
Main Results:
- All patients achieved complete sedation after the initial dose.
- The overall complication rate was 68.3%, with euphoria being the most common (58.3%), showing no significant difference between groups (P = 0.396).
- Intravenous midazolam resulted in faster sedation onset compared to intramuscular administration (P > 0.001).
- Significant changes in vital signs and oxygen saturation were observed within and between groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Both IM and IV midazolam are effective and safe for pediatric sedation in the ED.
- While IV midazolam provides quicker sedation, IM midazolam is a practical alternative for patients with limited IV access.
- Close monitoring for potential psychological side-effects is recommended for all sedated pediatric patients.
Background:
Sedation in children remains a controversial issue in emergency departments (ED). Midazolam, as a benzodiazepine is widely used for procedural sedation among paediatrics. We compared the effectiveness and safety of two forms of midazolam prescription; intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV).
Patients And Methods:
A cohort study was conducted on two matched groups of 30 children referred to our ED between 2010 and 2011. The first group received IM midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and the second group received IV midazolam (0.15 mg/kg) for sedation. For evaluating effectiveness, sedation, irritation and cooperation score were followed every 15 min for 60 min and for safety assessment, vital signs and O 2 saturation were observed.
Results:
Mean age was 6.18 ± 2.88 years and 31 patients (51.7%) were male. All patients were sedated completely after using first dose. There was an overall complication rate of 68.3%. 35 (58.3%) patients presented euphoria as the most common complication, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.396). Cases who received IV midazolam became sedated faster than those received IM midazolam (P > 0.001). The vital signs including heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure and O 2 saturation changed significantly between and within groups during the sedation (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Both forms of midazolam, IM and IV, are effective and safe for paediatric sedation in ED. Although the sedative with IV form might appear sooner, IM form of midazolam can be effectively used in patient with limited IV access. Patients are better to observe closely for psychological side-effects.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

