Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of cefadroxil and cephalothin disk susceptibility test results

A L Barry1, R N Jones

  • 1Clinical Microbiology Institute, Tualatin, Oregon 97062.

Insights

Cefadroxil and cephalothin disk diffusion tests show similar results for most bacteria. However, significant differences were observed for Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, and methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Clinical Pharmacy
  • Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Background:

  • Cefadroxil and cephalothin are first-generation cephalosporin antibiotics.
  • Accurate in vitro susceptibility testing is crucial for guiding antibiotic therapy.
  • Evaluating the interchangeability of antimicrobial disks can streamline laboratory workflows.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the interchangeability of cefadroxil and cephalothin disk diffusion tests for bacterial susceptibility.
  • To determine if cephalothin disk testing can reliably predict cefadroxil susceptibility.
  • To identify bacterial species where cefadroxil and cephalothin testing yield significantly different results.

Main Methods:

  • Diffusion susceptibility tests were performed using 30-micrograms cefadroxil and 30-micrograms cephalothin disks.
  • Standardized zone size interpretive criteria were applied for both agents.
  • The study analyzed data from 904 bacterial isolates representing various species.

Main Results:

  • Identical zone size interpretive criteria (≤14 mm for resistance, ≥18 mm for susceptibility) were recommended for both cefadroxil and cephalothin.
  • Significant discrepancies between cefadroxil and cephalothin testing were noted for Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, and methicillin-resistant staphylococci.
  • For other bacterial species tested, cefadroxil susceptibility could be reliably predicted using cephalothin disk diffusion or MIC results.

Conclusions:

  • Cephalothin disk diffusion testing can be used interchangeably with cefadroxil for most bacterial species.
  • Specific exceptions, including H. influenzae, L. monocytogenes, and MRSA, require distinct testing or interpretation.
  • The findings support the potential for using cephalothin as a surrogate for cefadroxil susceptibility testing in routine clinical microbiology.

Related Concept Videos