Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
Elucidating differences in metal absorption efficiencies between terrestrial soft-bodied and aquatic species
Mikołaj Owsianiak1, Karin Veltman2, Michael Z Hauschild1
1Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 426, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Metal absorption efficiency differs between terrestrial worms and aquatic species. Predictive models for terrestrial environments must account for soil interactions, unlike aquatic models.
Area of Science:
- Environmental toxicology
- Ecotoxicology
- Biogeochemistry
Background:
- Understanding metal absorption in terrestrial species is crucial for ecological risk assessment.
- Existing models for metal absorption are primarily developed for aquatic organisms.
- The applicability of these models to terrestrial soft-bodied species remains unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and compare models predicting metal absorption efficiency in terrestrial worms and aquatic species.
- To identify key metal physicochemical properties influencing absorption in different environments.
- To inform the development of terrestrial bioaccumulation and toxicity models.
Main Methods:
- Developed regression models for metal absorption efficiency using 23 metal physicochemical properties.
- Applied models to data from terrestrial earthworms and various aquatic species.
- Identified statistically significant predictors for each group.
Main Results:
- Metal absorption in terrestrial worms was predicted by 7 properties, with ionic potential being the strongest predictor.
- Metal absorption in aquatic species was predicted by 8 properties, with the covalent index being the most significant.
- Distinct metal properties govern absorption in terrestrial versus aquatic environments.
Conclusions:
- Metal absorption mechanisms differ between terrestrial and aquatic soft-bodied species.
- Terrestrial models require consideration of metal-soil interactions (e.g., ion exchange, desorption).
- Aquatic models are driven by metal affinity to transport proteins.
Related Concept Videos
Microbes and Other Elemental Cycles
Comparative Excretory Systems
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Metabolism of Chemolithotrophs

