Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

11:45
Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
Published on: August 17, 2022
2.0K
Development of a novel iPad-based laparoscopic trainer and comparison with a standard laparoscopic trainer for basic
Renai Yoon1, Michael Del Junco1, Adam Kaplan1
1Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, California.
Journal of Surgical Education
|July 24, 2014
Summary
The iTrainer (iT) offers superior image quality and resolution for laparoscopic training compared to standard pelvic trainers (SPT). While overall performance was rated lower, its portability and low cost make it a valuable supplementary training tool.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Simulation
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- A portable laparoscopic trainer, the iTrainer (iT), was developed using an iPad tablet.
- The iT was compared against a standard pelvic trainer (SPT) to evaluate surgical skills and performance metrics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of the iTrainer (iT) as a laparoscopic training tool.
- To compare the iT with a standard pelvic trainer (SPT) regarding surgical skill acquisition, image quality, and user experience.
Main Methods:
- The iTrainer (iT) was designed for compatibility with the Apple iPad 3 and standard laparoscopic instruments.
- Participants performed a standardized "thread-the-loops" task on both trainers, with randomized assignment and a brief warm-up period.
- Surgical skill was scored based on quality and quantity, and participants provided subjective ratings on image quality, resolution, brightness, comfort, and overall performance.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in task performance was observed between the iT and SPT across most participant groups, except for medical students who performed better on the SPT.
- Participants rated the iT as having significantly superior image quality and resolution compared to the SPT.
- The SPT received higher ratings for overall performance, while brightness and comfort were rated similarly for both trainers.
Conclusions:
- The iTrainer (iT) demonstrates face and criterion validity for the "thread-the-loops" task in laparoscopic training.
- While excelling in image quality and resolution, the iT was rated lower in overall performance than the SPT.
- The iT presents a cost-effective, portable, and accessible supplementary resource for laparoscopic surgical training.

