Medical consensus, guidelines, and position papers: a policy for the ECFS

Area of Science:

• Medical writing
• Scientific communication
• Healthcare policy

Background:

• Consensus, guideline, and position papers are frequently used interchangeably in scientific and medical contexts.
• The varying depth of evidence supporting these documents leads to differences in their robustness and intended purpose.
• Lack of clear distinction can cause confusion regarding the authority and applicability of recommendations.

Purpose of the Study:

• To define and differentiate between consensus, guideline, and position papers.
• To elucidate the interconnections and distinct characteristics of these document types.
• To outline the European Cystic Fibrosis Society's (ECFS) approach to utilizing these documents in its endorsed materials.

Main Methods:

• The study involved a conceptual analysis and commentary on existing terminology.
• The European Cystic Fibrosis Society's Board reviewed and discussed the definitions and applications of the terms.
• The commentary was developed to provide clarity for the ECFS and its stakeholders.

Main Results:

• The terms consensus, guideline, and position paper have distinct meanings, purposes, and levels of evidence.
• These documents are not interchangeable due to differences in their evidential foundation and scope.
• The ECFS has established criteria for how these document types are considered within its framework.

Conclusions:

• Clear definitions of consensus, guideline, and position papers are essential for accurate interpretation and application.
• Understanding the distinctions aids in evaluating the strength of evidence and recommendations provided.
• The ECFS utilizes a structured approach to ensure clarity and consistency in its published documents.