Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Method for Screening and Validation of Resistant Mutations Against Kinase Inhibitors
Published on: December 7, 2014
Relationship between SLCO1B3 and ABCA3 polymorphisms and imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients
Background:
Genetic variations in membrane transporters may contribute to imatinib mesylate (IM) resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Objective To investigate the relationship between SLCO1B3, SLCO1A2, and ABCA3 polymorphisms and IM response in CML patients.
Methods:
Patients in chronic phase CML (N = 118) were studied. All patients were treated with a standard dose of IM (400 mg/day) and classified into one of the two groups according to their responses. Major molecular response (MMR) and complete molecular response (CMR) were evaluated. Criteria for response failure were established according to European LeukemiaNet (2009). Analysis of the SLCO1B3 c.334T > G (rs4149117) and c.699G > A (rs7311358), SLCO1A2 c.516A > C (rs11568563) and c.-62-361G > A (rs3764043), and ABCA3 c.1755C > G (rs323043) and c.4548-191C > A (rs150929) polymorphisms was carried out by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Results:
SLCO1A2 and ABCA3 polymorphisms have similar frequencies between responders and non-responders. SLCO1B3 699GG and 344TT genotypes were more frequent in the responder group (63.8%) than in the non-responder group (44.7%, P = 0.042). Furthermore, carriers of 699GA/AA and 334TG/GG genotypes presented a higher probability of not responding to the standard dose of IM (odds ratio: 2.17; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-4.64, P = 0.04). Poor CMR for ABCA3 4548-91C > A was observed in patients with the CC/CA genotype when compared to AA carriers in the responder group (P = 0.014).
Conclusions:
SLCO1B3 699GG and 344TT genotypes are associated with non-response to IM, while ABCA3 4548-91 CC/CA genotypes are related to poor CMR in CML patients treated with standard-dose imatinib.
Insights
Genetic variations in SLCO1B3 and ABCA3 transporters impact imatinib mesylate response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Specific SLCO1B3 genotypes correlate with non-response, while ABCA3 genotypes are linked to poor complete molecular response.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacogenomics
- Hematology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Genetic variations in membrane transporters are implicated in imatinib mesylate (IM) resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
- Understanding these genetic factors is crucial for optimizing CML treatment.
- This study focuses on specific polymorphisms in SLCO1B3, SLCO1A2, and ABCA3 genes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between SLCO1B3, SLCO1A2, and ABCA3 gene polymorphisms and the response to imatinib mesylate in CML patients.
- To identify genetic markers that predict treatment outcomes in CML.
- To explore the role of these transporters in IM resistance.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 118 chronic phase CML patients treated with standard-dose IM was analyzed.
- Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to genotype specific polymorphisms in SLCO1B3, SLCO1A2, and ABCA3.
- Patients were classified based on their response to IM, including major molecular response (MMR) and complete molecular response (CMR), using European LeukemiaNet 2009 criteria.
Main Results:
- SLCO1A2 and ABCA3 polymorphisms showed no significant difference in frequency between responders and non-responders.
- SLCO1B3 genotypes 699GG and 334TT were more prevalent in the responder group.
- Carriers of SLCO1B3 699GA/AA and 334TG/GG genotypes had a higher likelihood of not responding to IM (OR: 2.17, P=0.04).
- ABCA3 4548-91 CC/CA genotypes were associated with poor CMR compared to AA carriers in responders (P=0.014).
Conclusions:
- Specific SLCO1B3 genotypes (699GG and 334TT) are linked to non-response to standard-dose imatinib in CML patients.
- Certain ABCA3 genotypes (4548-91 CC/CA) are associated with suboptimal complete molecular response.
- These findings highlight the pharmacogenetic influence of transporter genes on CML treatment efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Transporters: P-Glycoprotein and Solute Carrier Transporters
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
ABC Transporters: Exporter
Treatment Resistant Cancers

