Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: is tumoral enucleation a viable therapeutic option?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Robotic Enucleation of Esophageal Leiomyoma
Published on: February 20, 2026
W B Robb1, E Bruyere, D Amielh
1*Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Lille, France †North of France University, Lille, France ‡Integrated Research Center in Oncology: SIRIC ONCOLille, Lille, France §Inserm, UMR837, Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Center, Team 5 Mucins, Epithelial Differentiation and Carcinogenesis, Lille, France ¶University Hospital Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France ∥Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Objective:
The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of surgical enucleation of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs). Secondary objectives evaluated (i) the impact of tumor enucleation on oncological outcomes, (ii) the effect of pretherapeutic biopsy on the feasibility of E-GIST enucleation, and (iii) the impact of mucosal ulceration on outcome.
Background:
E-GISTs are very rare tumors and esophageal resection has been the recommended approach. The feasibility and impact on outcomes of tumor enucleation are unknown.
Methods:
Through a large national multicenter retrospective study, 19 patients with E-GISTs were identified between 2001 and 2010. Patients who underwent either enucleation or esophagectomy were compared.
Results:
Of over 19 patients identified with E-GISTs, curative treatment was surgical for 16 patients, with enucleation in 8 and esophagectomy in 8. In the enucleation group, median tumoral diameter was 40 mm (18-65 mm), without any mucosal ulceration, preoperative capsular ruptures, or incomplete resections. In the esophagectomy group, the median tumoral diameter was 85 mm (55-250 mm), with mucosal ulceration in 4 patients, preoperative capsular rupture in 1, and no incomplete resections. Severe postoperative complication rates were 50% and 25% in the esophagectomy and enucleation groups, respectively, with 2 postoperative deaths after esophagectomy. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 2 recurrences were observed after esophagectomy versus 0 after enucleation. Endoscopic biopsies did not expose patients to complications or local recurrence after enucleation. Endoscopic mucosal ulceration was associated with more aggressive tumors.
Conclusions:
E-GIST enucleation seems safe for tumors of less than 65 mm in diameter.
More Related Videos
05:16Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Published on: February 19, 2022
06:43Robotic Duodenal Sleeve Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Rare Exon 8 KIT Mutation Following Neoadjuvant Imatinib
Published on: April 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Esophageal Achalasia