Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Intravenous thrombolysis for minor stroke and rapidly improving symptoms: a quantitative overview
Qiang Huang1, Qingfeng Ma, Jianping Jia
1Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
Minor stroke and rapidly improving symptoms (MRIS) are usually excluded from intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) considering a possible benign prognosis and potential bleeding risk. However, its risk-benefit profile from IVT has not been fully illustrated. We searched PubMed for articles published up to December 2013 and included papers focused on the functional outcome of MRIS after IVT. The primary analysis was a comparison of the prognosis of MRIS after IVT versus non-minor stroke with IVT and MRIS without IVT, respectively. For safety analysis, the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality were compared. Statistic calculation was conducted using the RevMan5.1 software. A total of 13 citations encompassing 2905 MRIS cases were included. Favorable discharge outcome was more frequent in non-thrombolysed MRIS than thrombolysed MRIS with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.50 (95 % CI, 0.25-0.97), while no difference was noted in the outcome after 3 months (OR 0.99; 95 % CI, 0.74-1.34). Compared with non-minor stroke, MRIS had nearly 4 times more chance to have a favorable 3-month outcome after IVT, accompanied with a lower rate of SICH (pooled rate, 3.68 % versus 5.77 %; OR 0.57; 95 % CI, 0.39-0.84). Mortality was not significantly different for MRIS with or without IVT (OR 1.21; 95 % CI, 0.54-2.72) in the included population, but was still much less than non-minor stroke after IVT (OR 0.16; 95 % CI, 0.09-0.31). MRIS patients seem not to benefit from IVT in the short-term and 3-month outcomes due to increasing early hazards. Compared with non-minor stroke, MRIS with IVT suffers a significantly lower risk of SICH and death.
Insights
Minor stroke and rapidly improving symptoms (MRIS) patients may not benefit from intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) due to early risks. However, MRIS treated with IVT showed lower bleeding and mortality risks compared to non-minor stroke patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Stroke Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Minor stroke and rapidly improving symptoms (MRIS) are typically excluded from intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).
- The risk-benefit profile of IVT in MRIS patients remains incompletely understood.
- Existing data often excludes MRIS, limiting evidence on IVT efficacy and safety in this subgroup.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the functional outcomes and safety of IVT in patients with minor stroke and rapidly improving symptoms.
- To compare the prognosis of MRIS patients receiving IVT with those not receiving IVT.
- To compare the outcomes of MRIS patients receiving IVT with non-minor stroke patients receiving IVT.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed for studies published up to December 2013.
- Included studies focused on the functional outcomes and safety (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality) of MRIS after IVT.
- Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan5.1 software, including odds ratios and confidence intervals.
Main Results:
- A total of 13 citations involving 2905 MRIS cases were analyzed.
- Favorable discharge outcomes were more frequent in non-thrombolysed MRIS compared to thrombolysed MRIS (OR 0.50).
- No significant difference in 3-month outcomes was observed between thrombolysed and non-thrombolysed MRIS (OR 0.99).
- MRIS patients receiving IVT had a significantly lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) compared to non-minor stroke patients (3.68% vs 5.77%).
- MRIS patients receiving IVT had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to non-minor stroke patients (OR 0.16).
Conclusions:
- MRIS patients may not experience significant short-term or 3-month functional benefits from IVT, potentially due to increased early risks.
- Despite potential lack of short-term benefit, IVT in MRIS patients is associated with a significantly lower risk of SICH and death compared to non-minor stroke patients receiving IVT.
- Further research is needed to refine IVT guidelines for MRIS patients, balancing potential risks and benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis

