Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Comparison of treatment modalities in syndromic children with obstructive sleep apnea--a randomized cohort study
Shyam Sudhakar Sudarsan1, Vijaya Krishnan Paramasivan1, Senthil Vadivu Arumugam1
1Madras ENT Research Foundation (P) Ltd, Chennai, India.
Insights
Adenotonsillectomy (T&A) and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) offer comparable outcomes for treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in syndromic children. T&A is a viable first-line option, providing gradual improvement over one year.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Sleep Medicine
- Genetics and Rare Diseases
Background:
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is increasingly recognized in children, with significantly higher prevalence (50-100%) in syndromic populations like Down syndrome (DS) and Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS).
- Pediatric OSA negatively impacts Quality-of-Life (QOL) and presents management challenges.
- Thorough evaluation is crucial for effective intervention planning in syndromic children with OSA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of Adenotonsillectomy (T&A) versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).
- To evaluate treatment outcomes in syndromic children, specifically those with Down syndrome (DS) and Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS).
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized comparative study involving 124 syndromic children (DS and MPS) aged 6-12 years.
- Initial assessments included Polysomnogram (PSG), Epworth Sleepiness Scale-Children (ESS-C), and the OSA-18 QOL tool.
- Eighty children with positive PSG were randomized into T&A or CPAP groups, followed for one year with repeat assessments.
Main Results:
- Both T&A and CPAP groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) in Apnea-Hypoapnea Index (AHI), ESS-C scores, and QOL.
- Adenotonsillectomy (T&A) yielded comparable outcomes to CPAP in the long term.
- CPAP provided immediate, sustained symptom improvement, while T&A showed gradual, progressive improvement over the year.
Conclusions:
- Adenotonsillectomy (T&A) offers similar efficacy to CPAP for managing OSA in syndromic children.
- T&A can be considered a recommended first-line treatment option for this specific pediatric population.
- Both interventions significantly improve AHI, sleepiness, and QOL in syndromic children with OSA.
Introduction:
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common medical problem in adults that is becoming increasingly recognized in children. It occurs in the pediatric age group, from newborns to teens. More recently, many specialists have estimated OSA prevalence to be between 5 and 6%. However, in syndromic children, the prevalence of OSA can be from 50 to 100%, having a significant effect on their Quality-of-Life. As they are a challenging population for management, it is essential to evaluate them thoroughly before planning appropriate intervention.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy of Adenotonsillectomy (T&A) and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in syndromic children [Down syndrome (DS) and Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS)] with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).
Materials And Methods:
In a prospective, randomized, cohort comparative study, 124 syndromic children (DS and MPS) aged between 6 and 12 years were recruited from a private MPS support group and the Down Syndrome Society, Chennai. A standard assessment was performed on all children who entered the study including a full overnight Polysomnogram (PSG), Epworth Sleepiness Scale-Children (ESS-C) and Quality-of-Life (QOL) tool OSA-18. The children with positive PSG who consented for the study (n = 80) were randomly distributed to two groups, T&A group & CPAP group. The children were followed up with repeat PSG, clinical evaluation, ESS-C and Quality-of-Life (QOL) tool OSA-18 for a period of 1 year.
Observation And Results:
Follow-up was available for 73 syndromic children. Both the groups, T&A group and CPAP group, showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in Apnea-Hypoapnea Index (AHI), ESS-C, QOL from the intervention. In our study, T&A showed equal outcome compared to CPAP. The contrasting feature between the two groups was that CPAP use gave immediate sustained improvement while T&A gave gradual progressive improvement of symptoms over a period of 1 year.
Conclusion:
On average, T&A gives equal outcomes as CPAP and it can be suggested as a first-line treatment in this group of syndromic children.
Related Concept Videos
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Oxygen Therapy for Respiratory Failure
Oxygen therapy is vital in increasing and maintaining blood oxygen levels in PAH patients. As a result, it aids in reducing fatigue,...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Management of Insomnia
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation

