Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
The association between ICD interventions and mortality is independent of their modality: clinical implications
Gianluigi Bencardino1, Antonio Di Monaco, Teresa Rio
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies, including antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or shocks, face increased mortality. The risk appears linked to the underlying arrhythmias, not the specific ICD therapy used.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Severe structural heart disease patients have higher mortality post-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks.
- The impact of non-shock ICD therapies, like antitachycardia pacing (ATP), on mortality is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the long-term mortality impact of different ICD therapies (no intervention, ATP, shocks).
Main Methods:
- 573 patients undergoing ICD implantation were categorized into three groups: no device intervention, ATP intervention, or shock intervention.
- All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint, analyzed over a median follow-up of 48 months.
Main Results:
- Patients receiving ATP (43%) or shock (38%) interventions had higher mortality than those with no interventions (21%).
- Both ATP and shock interventions were independent predictors of all-cause mortality.
- No significant mortality difference was observed between ATP and shock intervention groups.
Conclusions:
- Appropriate ICD interventions, whether ATP or shocks, are associated with increased mortality risk.
- The risk appears related to the presence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias rather than the specific therapy modality.
- These findings highlight the prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ICDs.
Background:
Patients with severe structural heart disease have increased mortality after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks. Whether this is limited to ICD shock therapy only or extends also to no-shock therapies, such as antitachycardia pacing (ATP), is unclear. We investigated the impact of different ICD therapies on long-term mortality.
Methods:
We enrolled 573 patients who underwent ICD implantation at our institution from 2004 to 2011. The population was divided into 3 groups: no device interventions (group 1), ATP interventions (group 2), and shock interventions (group 3). The endpoint was the all-cause mortality.
Results:
Over a follow-up period of 48 months (range 1-110), 447 (78%) had no device interventions, 71 (12%) had ATP therapy only, and 55 (10%) had at least one shock intervention. All-cause mortality occurred in 94 patients in group 1 (21%), 23 patients (43%) in group 2, and 21 patients (38%) in group 3. At multivariable Cox regression analysis, ATP intervention (HR: 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3; P < 0.001), shock intervention (HR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.09-1.77; P = 0.008), age (HR: 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.07; P < 0.001), and LVEF (HR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.98; P = 0.001) were predictors of all-cause mortality. No significant difference in mortality was found between group 2 and 3.
Conclusion:
Patients with ICDs who receive appropriate interventions are at increased risk of mortality. Such risk is not dependent on different types of ICD therapy, such as shocks or ATP. Our data suggest that sustained ventricular arrhythmias per se have a negative impact on prognosis rather than modality of ICD therapy.
More Related Videos
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Heart Failure V: Medical Management