Remote ischemic preconditioning in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a single-center

Brian W McCrindle1, Nadia A Clarizia2, Svetlana Khaikin2

  • 1Labatt Family Heart Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (B.W.M.C., N.A.C., S.K., H.M.H., C.M., S.M.S., C.A.C., J.G.C., G.S.V.A., A.N.R.) Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (B.W.M.C., A.N.R.).

Insights

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) did not improve clinical outcomes or reduce injury markers in children undergoing cardiac surgery. This study found no significant difference in hospital stay or physiological markers between RIPC and sham groups.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Pediatric Critical Care
  • Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Background:

  • Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass can cause ischemia-reperfusion injury and inflammation.
  • Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a protective mechanism against such injuries.
  • The study investigated RIPC's effect on pediatric cardiac surgery outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if RIPC impacts clinical outcomes after pediatric cardiac surgery.
  • To assess RIPC's effect on physiological markers of ischemia-reperfusion injury and inflammation.
  • To evaluate RIPC's safety in pediatric patients.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 299 children (neonate to 17 years).
  • RIPC group received a blood pressure cuff stimulus; control group received a sham stimulus.
  • Primary outcome was postoperative hospital stay; secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory markers.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between RIPC (5.6 days) and sham (5.4 days) groups.
  • Few significant differences observed in other clinical outcomes or physiological markers.
  • Adverse events were similar between groups (5% sham, 6% RIPC).

Conclusions:

  • RIPC did not demonstrate significant clinical benefits in children undergoing cardiac surgery.
  • The protective effects of RIPC were not observed in this pediatric population.
  • RIPC is not associated with improved outcomes or reduced injury markers in this context.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos