Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International practice patterns and perceptions of pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for management of gastric cancer: A global clinician survey.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2026
Same author

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Outcomes for Colorectal and Mesothelioma Peritoneal Metastases: A 12-year Study.

Anticancer research·2026
Same author

Assessing data completeness in the international society for the study of pleura and peritoneum (ISSPP) PIPAC database: a multicenter evaluation from 2020-2024.

Pleura and peritoneum·2025
Same author

Real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases; Third annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database.

Pleura and peritoneum·2025
Same author

Long-Term Survival Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: A 22-Year Single Institution Experience.

ANZ journal of surgery·2025
Same author

Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): the first Australian experience.

Pleura and peritoneum·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator
03:49

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator

Published on: May 19, 2023

1.8K

Virtual reality versus box laparoscopic simulators in trainee selection and aptitude testing.

Iain A M Hennessey1, Peter Hewett

  • 1University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
|August 1, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Low-fidelity simulators, like the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) box trainer, show greater validity in selection centers compared to high-fidelity virtual reality simulators. The FLS effectively identifies high and low-performing outliers among participants.

More Related Videos

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

20.2K
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator
03:49

Evaluating Flight Performance and Eye Movement Patterns Using Virtual Reality Flight Simulator

Published on: May 19, 2023

1.8K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

20.2K
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Simulation
  • Surgical Education
  • Assessment Tools

Background:

  • Assessing surgical skills requires valid and reliable tools.
  • Simulators offer a controlled environment for skill evaluation.
  • Comparing simulator fidelity is crucial for effective selection processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the construct and concurrent validity of high-fidelity and low-fidelity simulators.
  • To evaluate simulator effectiveness in a selection center context.

Main Methods:

  • 46 novice and expert participants were tested.
  • Utilized the low-fidelity Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) box trainer.
  • Utilized the high-fidelity Lapsim virtual reality simulator.
  • Recorded outcome scores and performance metrics.

Main Results:

  • Experts outperformed novices on the FLS (71% vs. 51%, P<0.0001), but not on the Lapsim (59.1% vs. 57.1%, P=0.41).
  • No significant correlation was found between Lapsim metrics and FLS scores (r=-0.024, P=0.874).
  • Low-fidelity simulators identified performance outliers among novices.

Conclusions:

  • Low-fidelity simulators demonstrate higher validity in selection center scenarios.
  • Low-fidelity platforms are effective for identifying performance outliers.
  • Simulator fidelity impacts assessment validity in surgical training.