The rules of implicit evaluation by race, religion, and age
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
Published on: May 10, 2019
Jordan R Axt1, Charles R Ebersole2, Brian A Nosek3
1Department of Psychology, University of Virginia jaxt@virginia.edu.
Abstract:
The social world is stratified. Social hierarchies are known but often disavowed as anachronisms or unjust. Nonetheless, hierarchies may persist in social memory. In three studies (total N > 200,000), we found evidence of social hierarchies in implicit evaluation by race, religion, and age. Participants implicitly evaluated their own racial group most positively and the remaining racial groups in accordance with the following hierarchy: Whites > Asians > Blacks > Hispanics. Similarly, participants implicitly evaluated their own religion most positively and the remaining religions in accordance with the following hierarchy: Christianity > Judaism > Hinduism or Buddhism > Islam. In a final study, participants of all ages implicitly evaluated age groups following this rule: children > young adults > middle-age adults > older adults. These results suggest that the rules of social evaluation are pervasively embedded in culture and mind.
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Attitudes
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Implicit Personality Theories

