Comparison of active and purely visual performance in a multiple-string means-end task in infants
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
Published on: November 14, 2018
Lauriane Rat-Fischer1, J Kevin O'Regan1, Jacqueline Fagard1
1Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8158, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
Insights
Infants’ problem-solving on a multiple-string task depends on inhibitory control and action understanding. Success requires inhibiting immediate actions and anticipating others' actions, supporting the direct matching hypothesis.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Infants master single string-pulling tasks by 12 months.
- Many 16-month-olds fail multiple-string tasks, indicating a developmental challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate factors influencing infant problem-solving on a multiple-string task.
- Examine the role of inhibitory control and action anticipation in task success.
Main Methods:
- Assessed 16-20-month-olds on a multiple-string task, categorizing performance.
- Compared active task performance with visual anticipation of adult actions.
- Analyzed inhibitory control of the preferred hand and predictive looking strategies.
Main Results:
- Infant performance correlated with inhibitory control levels.
- Only successful action-task performers visually anticipated adult actions.
- Inhibitory control alone did not fully explain performance differences.
Conclusions:
- Infant success on the multiple-string task involves more than just inhibitory control.
- Findings support the direct matching hypothesis: performing actions precedes anticipating them.
- Action understanding is crucial for infants to predict others' behaviors.
Abstract:
The aim of the present study was to understand what factors influence infants' problem-solving behaviours on the multiple-string task. The main question focused on why infants usually solve the single string-pulling task at 12months at the latest, whereas most 16-month-old infants still cannot solve the task when several strings are presented, only one of which is attached to the desired object. We investigated whether this difficulty is related to infants' ability to inhibit their spontaneous immediate actions by comparing active and purely visual performance in this task. During the first part of the experiment, we assessed the ability of infants aged 16-20months to solve the multiple-string task. The infants were then divided into three groups based on performance (a "failure" group, an "intermediate" group, and a "success" group). The results of this action task suggest that there were differences in infants' performance according to their level of inhibitory control of their preferred hand. In the second part of the experiment, the three groups' predictive looking strategies were compared when seeing an adult performing the task. We found that only infants who successfully performed the action task also visually anticipated which string the adult had to pull in the visual task. Our results suggests that inhibitory control was not the only factor influencing infants' performance on the task. Furthermore, the data support the direct matching hypothesis (Rizzolatti and Fadiga, 2005), according to which infants need to be able to perform actions themselves before being able to anticipate similar actions performed by others.
Related Concept Videos
States of Arousal During Infancy
Vision During Infancy and Toddlerhood
Perceptual Development During Infancy
Imitation During Infancy and Toddlerhood
Early Vocalization During Infancy
Perceiving Language Sounds and Structure During Infancy

