Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
Quantitative Analysis01:12

Quantitative Analysis

1.7K
Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
1.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

14.4K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
14.4K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.9K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

627
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paralysis in public health: evidence as an alibi? - Authors' reply.

The Lancet. Public health·2026
Same author

Quantitative bias analysis for time to event data needs good validation data.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Combined Oral Contraceptives and Stroke Risk in Individuals With Migraine With Aura.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Hepatitis B and C Prevention, Screening and Diagnostic Services at HIV Treatment Sites: International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2026
Same author

One- and Two-Year Outcomes of Switching to a Dolutegravir-Based ART Regimen: An Observational Emulation of Sequential Target Trials.

Open forum infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Uptake and retention in HIV care among pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV under different eras of vertical transmission prevention policies in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same journal

Age at menarche and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: triangulating evidence from multivariable and Mendelian randomization analyses.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Life-course trajectories of cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural India: Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) 2003-2023.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Young Lives study.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

From the departing Editors in Chief.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Data Resource Profile: Cheeloo Lifespan Electronic-health reseArch Data-library (Cheeloo LEAD).

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Cohort.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

1.1K

Good practices for quantitative bias analysis.

Timothy L Lash1, Matthew P Fox2, Richard F MacLehose2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA, Department of Epidemiology and Center for Global Health & Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health and Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada and Department of Epidemiology and Department of Statistics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA tlash@emory.edu.

International Journal of Epidemiology
|August 1, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative bias analysis in epidemiology quantifies systematic errors and uncertainty. This guide details best practices for applying these methods, enhancing research reliability and resource allocation.

Keywords:
Epidemiological biasesanalysisbest practice

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

1.1K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Quantitative Research Methods

Background:

  • Quantitative bias analysis is crucial for assessing systematic errors in epidemiological research.
  • Despite established methods, widespread adoption is hindered by perceived complexity and lack of confidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a guide on good practices for applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiological data.
  • To address common questions regarding the practical application and interpretation of bias analysis.

Main Methods:

  • The paper outlines principles for selecting relevant biases to address.
  • It discusses methods for modeling biases and assigning parameter values.
  • Guidance is provided on presenting and interpreting bias analysis results.

Main Results:

  • Quantitative bias analysis offers a numerical estimate of bias direction, magnitude, and uncertainty.
  • It helps mitigate overconfidence in research findings.
  • Bias analysis can direct research resources to areas of greatest uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing quantitative bias analysis improves the rigor of epidemiological research.
  • This guide aims to increase the use of bias analysis for more accurate research interpretation.
  • Adopting these practices enhances the understanding of potential biases and their impact on estimates.