Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Cost effectiveness of treatments for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
Fotini Gialama1, Evangelia Miloni, Nikos Maniadakis
1Department of Health Services Organization and Management, National School of Public Health, 196 Alexandras Avenue, 115 21, Athens, Greece.
Insights
Most treatments for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are cost-effective or cost-saving. Treatment decisions should consider patient risk profiles and costs for optimal economic value.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally.
- Rising healthcare costs necessitate economically viable treatment options for ACS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS).
Main Methods:
- Conducted a literature search of PubMed and Cochrane Library up to October 2013.
- Included economic evaluations (CEA, CUA, CMA, CCA, CBA) of NSTE-ACS treatments, excluding reviews and opinions.
- Assessed methodological quality using the BMJ checklist.
Main Results:
- Included 39 studies with diverse methodologies and settings.
- Reported a wide range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for evaluated treatments.
Conclusions:
- Most NSTE-ACS treatments are cost-saving or cost-effective.
- Cost-effectiveness depends on patient risk and treatment costs, requiring careful consideration in decision-making.
Background:
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents the most common subset of cardiovascular heart diseases and relates to high rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide and, consequently, to both the direct and indirect costs to the health system and society. Given the rising healthcare costs combined with budgetary constraints, health care systems and decision makers are faced with challenging decisions and the need to choose alternative treatments that not only improve patient quantity and quality of life but are also economically attractive.
Objectives:
To systematically review the published literature and to identify studies evaluating the cost effectiveness of different treatments for patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS.
Data Sources:
A literature search was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library until October 2013, with no limit on publication date.
Study Selection:
The search was conducted using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, limiting articles to those published in the English language and those reporting results of economic evaluations [i.e. cost-effectiveness (CEA), cost-utility (CUA) cost-minimisation (CMA) cost-consequence (CCA) and cost-benefit (CBA) analyses] of the different treatment therapies used for managing patients presenting with NSTE-ACS. Publications such as editorials, letters to the editor, posters, expert opinions, reviews, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses were excluded.
Study Appraisal Methods:
All studies included were assessed for their methodological quality using the British Medical Journal checklist.
Results:
A total of 39 studies were included, presenting a wide variation in terms of methodological approaches and settings, thus resulting in different ranges of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each treatment evaluated.
Conclusions:
Evidence from the present systematic review suggests that the majority of the available treatments represent either cost-saving or cost-effective options for NSTE-ACS patients. Moreover, the cost effectiveness of the available treatments was found to be dependent on various factors, particularly the risk profile of patients and the cost of treatment, and hence there is a need to take these into consideration when making decisions and choices.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Angina IV: Management