Prognostic value of N-terminal pro C-type natriuretic peptide in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Integration of Brain Tissue Saturation Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Heart Failure
Published on: October 1, 2019
Dirk J Lok1, Ijsbrand T Klip, Adriaan A Voors
1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Insights
N-terminal pro C-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proCNP) predicts outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but not in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This finding offers new insights into HFpEF prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarkers
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Natriuretic peptides (NPs) like A-type and B-type are established heart failure (HF) biomarkers.
- C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is primarily localized in the endothelium, and its prognostic role in HF is unclear.
- The N-terminal part of pro CNP (NT-proCNP) has not been fully evaluated for its prognostic significance in chronic HF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic power of NT-proCNP in patients with chronic heart failure.
- To identify clinical correlates of NT-proCNP levels in this patient population.
- To determine if NT-proCNP has differential prognostic value in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 567 hospitalized heart failure patients had NT-proCNP levels measured at discharge.
- The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization over 18 months.
- Multivariate regression analyses and reclassification methods were used to assess NT-proCNP's predictive value, considering ejection fraction subtypes (HFpEF vs. HFrEF).
Main Results:
- NT-proCNP levels correlated positively with NT-proBNP and renal function parameters, and negatively with female sex and VEGF.
- In multivariate analysis, NT-proCNP was a strong independent predictor of the primary endpoint in HFpEF (HR 1.78, P=0.006) but not in HFrEF (HR 1.07, P=0.616).
- NT-proCNP demonstrated significant additive prognostic value in HFpEF (P < 0.001) but not in HFrEF (P = 0.453).
Conclusions:
- NT-proCNP serves as a potent independent prognostic marker for adverse outcomes specifically in patients with HFpEF.
- The prognostic utility of NT-proCNP does not extend to patients with HFrEF.
- These findings highlight the potential role of NT-proCNP in risk stratification for HFpEF patients.
Aims:
A-type and B-type natriuretic peptides are established markers in chronic heart failure (HF). C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) belongs to the same peptide family, but is predominantly localized in the endothelium. The prognostic role of CNP in heart failure has not been established. The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic power and clinical correlates of the N-terminal part of pro CNP (NT-proCNP) in patients with chronic HF.
Methods And Results:
In 567 hospitalized heart failure patients, NT-proCNP levels were measured at hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization after 18 months. Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was pre-defined as an LVEF >40%. Mean (±SD) age was 71 ± 11 years, 62% were male, mean LVEF was 32 ± 14%, and 23% had HFpEF. In multivariate linear regression, NT-proCNP levels showed a positive correlation with NT-proBNP levels and parameters of renal function, whereas a negative correlation with female sex and vascular endothelial growth factor was observed. After 18 months follow-up, 240 patients reached the combined endpoint. We observed interaction between NT-proCNP and LVEF for outcome (P = 0.046). Multivariate analyses revealed NT-proCNP to be strongly predictive for the primary endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-2.67, P = 0.006) in patients with HFpEF, but not in patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.81-1.43, P = 0.616). Finally, reclassification showed significant additive value in patients with HFpEF (P < 0.001), but not in those with HFrEF (P = 0.453).
Conclusion:
NT-proCNP is a strong independent marker for outcome in patients with HFpEF, but not in those with HFrEF.
More Related Videos
08:21Functional Assessment of the Donor Heart During Ex Situ Perfusion: Insights from Pressure-Volume Loops and Surface Echocardiography
Published on: October 11, 2022
10:03Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Experimental Models of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: June 27, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure V: Medical Management