Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2026

Cholesterol Efflux Assay
Published on: March 6, 2012
Cost effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy in The Netherlands. Simvastatin versus cholestyramine
L L Martens1, F F Rutten, D W Erkelens
1Department of Health Economics, Limburg State University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Insights
Simvastatin is a more cost-effective treatment for high cholesterol than cholestyramine, offering significant savings per year of life saved. Early initiation of simvastatin therapy enhances its value in preventing coronary heart disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide.
- Elevated serum cholesterol levels are a primary risk factor for CHD.
- Statins and bile acid sequestrants are established therapies for hypercholesterolemia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of simvastatin versus cholestyramine for CHD prevention.
- To evaluate the economic impact of lipid-lowering therapies based on patient age and cholesterol levels.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a CHD incidence model based on Framingham Heart Study data.
- Employed multivariate logistic regression functions to estimate outcomes.
- Calculated cost-effectiveness ratios in Dutch guilders per year of life saved.
Main Results:
- For men with initial cholesterol of 310 mg/dl, cholestyramine cost-effectiveness ranged from 220,000 to 510,000 guilders/year of life saved.
- Simvastatin demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness, ranging from 50,000 to 110,000 guilders/year of life saved for the same group.
- Similar cost-effectiveness patterns were observed in women, though generally less favorable.
Conclusions:
- Simvastatin is substantially more cost-effective than cholestyramine for CHD prevention.
- Simvastatin's cost-effectiveness is comparable to other accepted medical practices, particularly when initiated early.
- Simvastatin is recommended as a first-choice drug for elevated cholesterol, pending further long-term safety data.
Abstract:
Using a model of coronary heart disease incidence based on multivariate logistic regression functions from the Framingham Heart Study, the cost effectiveness of simvastatin was compared with that of cholestyramine in preventing such disease. For men with initial cholesterol levels of 310 mg/dl, the cost effectiveness of cholestyramine, expressed in Dutch guilders, ranges from approximately 220,000 to 510,000 guilders per year of life saved, depending on age at initiation of therapy. For simvastatin, cost-effectiveness ratios range from 50,000 to 110,000 guilders per year of life saved among this group of men. Results are similar for women, although the cost effectiveness of both agents is considerably less. These results suggest that simvastatin is substantially more cost effective than cholestyramine; that it compares well with other generally accepted medical practices, especially if therapy is initiated at an early age; and that simvastatin should become accepted as a drug of first choice in the treatment of persons with elevated serum cholesterol levels as its long-term safety record becomes more established.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Lipids: Dietary Sources and Requirements
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Atherosclerosis III: Management

