Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone radiogrametry: caliper versus magnifying glass.

H Rico1, E R Hernandez

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Calcified Tissue International
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

A study comparing radiogrammetry methods found that using a magnifying glass for bone measurements is more reliable and precise than using a caliper. This is crucial for accurate bone mass assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantum simulations of neutral water clusters and singly-charged water cluster anions.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2022
Same author

Interrelation of Elasticity and Thermal Bath in Nanotube Cantilevers.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Paths towards equilibrium in molecular systems: The case of water.

Physical review. E·2019
Same author

A chain-of-states acceleration method for the efficient location of minimum energy paths.

The Journal of chemical physics·2015
Same author

First-principles simulations of lithium melting: stability of the bcc phase close to melting.

Physical review letters·2010
Same author

Amphiphillic organic crystals.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2009

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Radiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Radiogrammetry is a method used to assess bone dimensions and cortical thickness.
  • Accurate measurement techniques are essential for reliable bone mass assessment and diagnosis of skeletal conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reliability and precision of two radiogrammetry methods: caliper versus magnifying glass.
  • To evaluate intra-observer and inter-observer variability for each measurement technique.

Main Methods:

  • Radiogrammetry was performed on 100 hands by two observers.
  • Measurements of total width (D) and medullary width (d) at the second metacarpal mid-point were taken using both caliper and magnifying glass.
  • Cortical thickness (C) was calculated as D-d.

Main Results:

  • The magnifying glass method yielded smaller intra-observer coefficients of variation (CV) (1.9% and 2.1%) compared to the caliper method (2.8% and 4.3%).
  • Inter-observer CV was also lower with the magnifying glass (4.2% and 5.7%) than with the caliper (6.2% and 6.9%).
  • While both methods showed significant correlation, the absolute values and precision of cortical thickness measurements differed, favoring the magnifying glass.

Conclusions:

  • The magnifying glass method demonstrates greater reliability and precision for radiogrammetric measurements compared to the caliper.
  • These findings suggest that the choice of measurement tool significantly impacts bone mass quantitation.
  • The magnifying glass is recommended for more accurate bone assessment in clinical and research settings.

Related Experiment Videos