Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Technology-Based Interventions for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Adults: A Scoping Review.

Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology·2026
Same author

Sport Participation and Nutrition in Students: A Scoping Review of Neuroendocrine and Autonomic Mechanisms Linking Lifestyle Behaviors to Cognitive and Academic Outcomes.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

The Gut Microbiota-Polyphenol-NLRP3 Inflammasome Axis: A Key Regulatory Network Linking Diet to Chronic Inflammation.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Interchangeability of CSF and PET to identify Alzheimer's disease pathology.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Correlation between in vivo <sup>18</sup>F-flortaucipir PET and whole-brain postmortem histological tau signals in Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

The "Radicular Tank": A Novel Concept in Endodontics Achieved with the MEA Inverse Taper<sup>®</sup> Technique.

Dentistry journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Sergio Chieffi1, Alessandro Iavarone, Leonardo Iaccarino

  • 1Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy, sergio.chieffi@unina2.it.

Experimental Brain Research
|August 6, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Older adults show increased susceptibility to visual distraction, impacting line bisection tasks. This age-related difference in attentional mechanisms may explain difficulties in ignoring irrelevant information.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

17.3K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

15.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

17.3K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

15.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Aging Research

Background:

  • Distractor interference impacts visual perception and spatial cognition.
  • Age-related changes in attentional mechanisms are well-documented.
  • Understanding these changes is crucial for cognitive health in aging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate age-related differences in susceptibility to distractor interference during a line bisection task.
  • To examine how distractor location (left vs. right hemispace) affects performance in older and younger adults.
  • To explore the role of attentional inhibition in age-related distractor effects.

Main Methods:

  • A bisection paradigm was employed with older and younger participants.
  • Participants bisected a horizontal line presented with flanking distractors.
  • Distractor positions were varied in the left and right hemispace.

Main Results:

  • Distractors interfered with line bisection in both age groups, shifting the subjective midpoint away from the distractor.
  • The magnitude of this subjective midpoint shift was significantly greater in older adults compared to younger adults when distractors were in the left hemispace.
  • This suggests an age-related increase in susceptibility to distractor interference, particularly in specific spatial contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Older adults exhibit heightened vulnerability to distractor interference during spatial tasks.
  • Attentional mechanisms, specifically the inhibition of irrelevant information, appear to be altered with age.
  • These findings have implications for understanding cognitive aging and potential interventions for attentional deficits.