Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Method of Joints: Problem Solving II01:30

Method of Joints: Problem Solving II

1.6K
Consider a truss structure with frictionless joints fixed to a wall and roller support. If a force of 150 N is applied to joint A, the forces in each member of the truss can be determined using the method of joints.
1.6K
Method of Joints: Problem Solving I01:30

Method of Joints: Problem Solving I

1.9K
The method of joints is a commonly used technique to analyze the forces in structural trusses. The method is based on the principle of equilibrium, which assumes that the truss members are connected by frictionless pins. The forces at each joint can be determined by considering the equilibrium of the forces acting on that joint. Consider a truss structure with two forces of 20 N and 10 N acting at joints C and D, respectively. The method of joints can be used to determine the forces FCB, FDC,...
1.9K
Knee Joint01:23

Knee Joint

3.4K
The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
3.4K
Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings01:11

Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings

677
When a rod is made of different materials or has various cross-sections, it must be divided into parts that meet the necessary conditions for determining the deformation. These parts are each characterized by their internal force, cross-sectional area, length, and modulus of elasticity. These parameters are then used to compute the deformation of the entire rod.
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...
677
Space Trusses: Problem Solving01:29

Space Trusses: Problem Solving

1.4K
A space truss is a three-dimensional counterpart of a planar truss. These structures consist of members connected at their ends, often utilizing ball-and-socket joints to create a stable and versatile framework. Due to its adaptability and capacity to withstand complex loads, the space truss is widely used in various construction projects.
Consider a tripod consisting of a tetrahedral space truss with a ball-and-socket joint at C. Suppose the height and lengths of the horizontal and vertical...
1.4K
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading01:12

General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading

688
Unsymmetrical bending occurs when the bending moment applied to a structural member does not align with its principal axis. This misalignment leads to complex stress distributions and deflection patterns that differ from symmetrical bending, which are essential for designing structures to withstand different loading conditions.
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
688

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of a virtual implantation algorithm to quantify surgeon control and optimize stem selection in total hip arthroplasty.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Design of Human-Inspired Feet to Enhance the Performance of the Humanoid Robot Mithra.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Accuracy of machine learning techniques for real-time prediction of implanted lower limb mechanics with comprehensive and reduced input parameters.

Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Three-dimensional pelvic kinematics in healthy, total hip arthroplasty, and lumbar fusion patients using stereo-radiography.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2025
Same author

Hip Stability After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quantifying Capsule and Passive Muscle Contributions.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2025
Same author

Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling and Force Prediction: Verification Through Experimental Neuromuscular Dynamics.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

18.5K

Estimating total knee replacement joint load ratios from kinematics.

Clare K Fitzpatrick1, Paul J Rullkoetter1

  • 1Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2390 S. York St., Denver, CO 80208, USA.

Journal of Biomechanics
|August 6, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting total knee replacement (TKR) joint loads from motion is accurate. This method allows for better implant design evaluation across more patients using kinematic data.

Keywords:
Finite elementFluoroscopyForce predictionJoint load ratiosKinematicsTotal knee replacement

More Related Videos

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

10.0K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

18.5K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

10.0K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Medical Device Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of joint loads in total knee replacement (TKR) is crucial for evaluating implant designs.
  • Current in vivo load measurements are limited to a small number of patients, necessitating broader assessment.
  • Predicting joint loads from kinematics offers a scalable approach for larger patient populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of predicting internal-external (I-E) and anterior-posterior (A-P) joint loads from joint kinematics.
  • To evaluate the repeatability of joint load ratios (I-E torque to compressive force [I-E:C], A-P force to compressive force [A-P:C]) under varying compressive loads.
  • To understand the influence of kinematic measurement error on joint load predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a tibiofemoral finite element model.
  • Simulation of deep knee bend, chair-rise, and step-up activities for five patients.
  • Comparison of model predictions with telemetric measurements to determine root-mean-square (RMS) differences in load ratios.

Main Results:

  • RMS differences in I-E:C and A-P:C load ratios between measurements and predictions were below 1.10e-3 Nm/N and 0.035 N/N, respectively.
  • Load ratios were consistently reproduced across different compressive force profiles (RMS differences < 0.53e-3 Nm/N and 0.010 N/N).
  • Joint load predictions showed tolerance to kinematic measurement errors, especially with low component conformity.

Conclusions:

  • Predicting TKR joint loads from kinematics is accurate and repeatable.
  • Kinematic data analysis can effectively determine the scope of joint loading ratios in the TKR population.
  • This approach supports broader assessment of TKR implant performance across diverse patients.